关于侵占罪认定的主要争议问题探析

Analysis on the Main Disputes of the Seizing Offense Affirmation

自1997年刑法增设侵占罪的规定以来,对于侵占罪的认定在法学界和司法界一直存有争议。本文对于侵占罪认定的两个主要方面,即对侵占罪的犯罪对象的认定和对侵占行为的认定,作了具体的分析和阐述。在侵占罪的犯罪对象方面界定了何为"代为保管的他人财物"和"他人的遗忘物或者埋藏物";在侵占行为的认定方面主要界定了"合法持有","非法占有","拒不退还"或"拒不交出"等行为。

Since the seizing offense was added in penal code in 1997, its affirmation has had disputes in the law and judicial circle. This article makes a specific analysis and expatiation on two main aspects: 1. affirm the crime object of seizing offense; 2.affirm the seizing behavior. In the crime object of seizing offense, it defines what is 'others' properties looked after instead' and 'others' leftover or buried thing'; in the affirmation of seizing behavior , it defines 'hold legally,' 'occupy illegally,' 'refuse not to send back,' or 'refuse not to hand over,' and so on.