期刊文献+

论受教育权 被引量:5

On the Right to Education
原文传递
导出
摘要 每个人都有受教育的权利,中国法律和国际法对此都作了明确的规定。一些西方法学家对有关法律的实施问题进行了研究,但国内外学术界对受教育权的合理性还缺乏深入的探讨。本文根据中国的情况,讨论法律对受教育权的规定,着重研究这一权利的伦理基础,目的是填补一些理论空白,并解决中国学术界十多年来一直争论的关于“教育产业化”的难题。 Everyone has the right to education. This is clearly stated in both Chinese law and international law. While some Western jurists have studied the enforcement of relevant laws, there is little discussion about the moral foundation of the right to education. Opposition to 'positive rights' is still a theoretical obstacle to the implementation of these laws. This paper first discusses the requirements of the laws concerning the right to education in the context of China, and then explores the moral foundation of this right. Such a study may fill some gaps in educational law and educational philosophy, and solve the difficult problem of 'commercialization of education, ' over which Chinese scholars have debated for more than a decade.
作者 袁征
出处 《清华大学教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第4期7-11,共5页 Tsinghua Journal of Education
关键词 受教育权 教育哲学 法律规定 教育产业化 消极权利 积极权利 right to education rights educational philosophy educational law commercialization of education
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1吴洛夫.“教育产业化”纷争:综述与思考[J].现代大学教育,2002,18(5):29-32. 被引量:6
  • 2Sara Gustafsson The Human Right to Education.Nordic Journal of International Law.1999,(4).
  • 3Tibor Machan.The Perils of Positive Rights.Ideas on Liberty,200 1,(4).
  • 4Milton Friedman.Capitalism and Freedom.Chicago:University of Chicago press.1962.31,86-7.
  • 5Milton Friedman Capitalism and Freedom.89;Siegfried Jenkner.Towards a School Constitution for Freedom..A Comparative Analysis in Western and Eastern Europe. European Journal for Education Law and Policy. 1999, (2).

二级参考文献7

共引文献5

同被引文献59

引证文献5

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部