1Tim Huxley, Southeast Asia in the study of intemational relations: the rise and decline of a region, The Pacific Review. Vol.9. No.2 1996.pp. 199 - 228.
2Jurgen Ruland.ASEAN and the Asian crisis:theoretical implications and practical consequences for Southeast Asian regionalism.The Pacific Review.Vol.13.No.3.2000.p.421.p.422.
3Nikolas Busse.Construtivism and Southeast Asia security,The Pacific review.Vol,12.No,1999.p.40.
4Nikolas Busse, Constructivism and Southeast Area security, The Pacific review, Vol.12, No.1 1999, p.41.p.422.
5Alexander Wendt, ' Anarchy is what states make of it : the social construction of power politics', Internatianal Organization 46: p. 397 .
6Sorpong Peou, Realism and consturctivism in Southeast Asian security studies today:a review essay,The Pacific review.Vol,15.No,1.2002.p.121.
7Michael Leifer.The ASEAN Regional Forum.Adelphia Paper 302.Oxford University Press.1996.p.59.
8Michael Leifer,'Indochina and ASEAN: seeking a new balance', Contemporary Southeaset Asia, 15 (3), pp.274-275.p.153.
9Michael leifer, ASEA.N and the security of Southeast Asia .London: Routledge, 1989. p.141. p.142. p.150.p.55.
10Michael Leifer, The ASEAN peace process: a category mistake,The Pacific Review. Vol. 12. No.1 1999.pp.25-38.
5Prospects for Defence and Security Cooperation in ASEAN.Paper presented to the conference on ASEAN and the Asia - Pacific Region: Prospects for Security Cooperation in the 1990s. Manila, June 5 -7,1991:5.
6Roger Mitton and Alejandro Reyes. Hurting in Hanoi.Asiaweek, December 25,1998:30.
8Michael Vatikiotis. Border Burdens. Far Eastern Economic Review, March 6,1997:34.
9Ronald J. Yalem. Regional Security Communities. in George W,Keeton, George Scharzenberger, ed: The Yearbook on International Affairs, London : Stevens, 1979 : 217 - 223.
