期刊文献+

纯培养下拟茎点霉分生孢子的形成及意义 被引量:13

TAXONOMIC SIGNIFICANCE OF CONIDIAL FORMATION OF PHOMOPSIS IN PURE CULTURE
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以18种共23个拟茎点霉菌株为材料,比较了在25℃、12h光照(40w日光灯)/d条件下不同培养基上甲、乙型分生孢子的形成情况。结果表明,苜蓿煎汁+Czapek培养基能促使多数拟茎点霉菌株形成甲、乙两型分生孢子,其形态及大小也与自然寄主上的相一致。根据纯培养获得的形态特征对原始描述缺乙型分生孢子特征记载的Phomopsis durionis, homopsis sterculicola, Phomopsis macadamii, Phomopsis lucumicola和Phomopsis tinea进行了补充描述。 The formation status of αand βconidia of 23 isolates of Phomopsis (Sacc.) Bubak belonging to 18 species on different media under the circumstances of 25℃ and 12 h lighting each day (fluorescent light, 40W; interval: 30cm) were compared. The results showed that alfalfa extract+Czapek medium could impel most of isolates to produce αandβconidia. The shapes and sizes of αandβconidia on the medium were almost the same as those on the host plants. Therefore the original descriptions of Phomopsis durionis, P. sterculicola, P. macadamii, P. lucumicola and P. tinea which could not produceβconidia on the hosts should be supplemented according to their morphological characteristics in pure culture.
出处 《菌物学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2004年第3期375-380,共6页 Mycosystema
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(39870001 39899400) 高等学校骨干教师资助计划项目的部分内容
关键词 拟茎点霉属 腔孢纲 植物病害 分生孢子 纯培养 真菌 Alfalfa extract+czapek, α- conidia, β- conidia
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献12

  • 1姜子德.广东省拟茎点霉属形态学分类及RAPD分析.华南农业大学博士学位论文[M].,1999..
  • 2Uecker F A. A world list of Phomopsis names with notes on nomenclature, morphology and biology [M]. Berlin:J Cramer Publisher, 1988. 1- 231.
  • 3Innis M A, Gelfand, Sninsky J J, et al. PCR protocols guide to methods and applications[M]. Califomia: Academic Press, 1990. 282-287.
  • 4Nei M, Li W H. Mathematical model for studing genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases[J]. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,1979, 76(10) : 5269 - 5273.
  • 5Femandaz F A, Hanlin R T. Morphological and RAPD analyses of Diaporthe phaselorum from soybean [J]. Mycologia, 1996, 80(3) : 425 -440.
  • 6Spalding D H. Resistance of mango pathogens to fungicides used to control postharvest diseases [J]. Plant Disease, 1982, 66(12): 1185-1186.
  • 7Tonmmerup I C, Barton J E, O'Brien P A. Reliability of RAPD finger-printing of three basidiomycete fungi,Laccaria,Hydnangium and Rhizoctonia[J]. Mycol. Res., 1995, 99(2): 179-186.
  • 8Gandeboeuf D, Dupre C, Roeckel-Drevet P, et al. Grouping arid identification of Tuber species using RAPD markers [ J]. Can. J. Bot.,1997, 75(1): 36-45.
  • 9Malvick D K. Characterization of Aphanomyces euteiches strains based on pathogenicity tests and random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis[J].Mycol. Res., 1998, 102(4): 465-475.
  • 10Sharma T R, Tewari J P. RAPD analysis of three Alternaria species pathogenic to crucifers [J]. Mycol. Res., 1998, 102(7) : 807 - 814.

共引文献36

同被引文献139

引证文献13

二级引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部