期刊文献+

基于ATAM的C^4ISR体系结构产品评估 被引量:1

Evaluating C^4ISR architecture products based on ATAM
下载PDF
导出
摘要 体系结构是对复杂系统的组成部分及相互关系的描述,对体系结构进行评价是十分重要的。美国SEI(软件工程研究所)提出一种评价信息系统体系结构的方法———ATAM(architecturetradeoffanalysismethod)。ATAM是一种围绕体系结构质量属性而展开的分析方法,它集中于确认是否满足质量属性。利用ATAM方法从作战环境和后勤环境的想定出发,来评估C4ISR体系结构产品。通过对性能、可修改性、可靠性、安全性等多个属性的分析,得到特定属性的敏感点,然后综合分析敏感点,从而得到C4ISR体系结构产品的折衷点。 Architecture describes the components of a complex system and their relations. It is very important to evaluate the architecture. The Software Engineering Institute brings forward a method named ATAM. ATAM is an analytical method about architecture quality attributes, focuing on the quality attributes. The C^4ISR architecture products are evaluated based on the scenario of operational environment and logistics environment by using ATAM. The sensitivity points are obtained by analyzing some attributes such as performance, modifiability, dependability and security. Then the tradeoff points of C^4ISR architecture products are got through synthetic analysis of sensitivity points.
出处 《系统工程与电子技术》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2004年第6期760-763,共4页 Systems Engineering and Electronics
基金 十五"国防预研项目资助课题(413060102)
关键词 体系结构评估分析方法 指挥自动化系统 体系结构 评估 ATAM C^4ISR architecture evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1C+4ISR Architecture Working Group. C+4ISR Architecture Framework Version 2.0 [R]. Department of Defense,1997.
  • 2Barbacci, Mario R, Wood William G. Architecture Tradeoff Analyses of C+4ISR Products, June 1999.
  • 3Kazman R. Scenario-Based Analysis of Software Architecture[J]. IEEE Software, 1996,13(6):47-55
  • 4Smith C, Williams L.Software Performance Engineering:A Case Study Including Performance Comparison with Design Alternatives[J].IEEE Tranas. on Software Engineering, 1993, 19(7):720-741.
  • 5Kazman R, Klein M, et al. The Architecture Tradeoff Analysis Method[C],Proceedings of ICECCS.Montercy,CA.1988. 68-78.
  • 6Kazman R, Barbacci M, et al.Experience with Performing Architecture Tradeoff Analysis[C].Proceeding of ICSE99,1999. 54-63.

同被引文献10

  • 1O Balci. Verification, Validation, and Accreditation[ C ]. In : D. J. Medeiros. E. F. Watson, J. S. Carson, and M. S. Manivannan. Processing of the 1998 Winter Simulation Conference, IEEE Com- puter Society Press, 1998:41-48.
  • 2D K Pace. Impact of Simulation Description on Conceptual Valida- tion [ J ]. Johns Hopkins PAL Technical Digest, 2000,21 (3) :327 -336.
  • 3J Chew, C Sullivan. Verification, Validation, and Accreditation in the Life Cycle of Models and Simulation [ C ]. In: J. A. Joines, R. R. Barton, K. Kang, and P. A. Fishwick. Proceedings of the 2000 Winter Simulation Conference, 2000.
  • 4DMSO. Department of Defense Verification, Validation and Ac- creditation(VV&A) Recommended Practices Guide[ R]. 1996.
  • 5S Youngblood, D K Pace, S Mahadevan. Risk-Based VV&A Methodology the Concept of M&S Use Risk [ DB ]. http://www. sisostds, org, 2010-10-10, 2011-06-10.
  • 6E M Clarke, E A Emerson, A R Sistla. Automatic verification of finite state concurrent systems using temporal logic specifications [ J ]. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 1986,8(2) :244-263.
  • 7G Shanks, E Tansley, R Weber. Using Ontology to Validate Con- ceptual Models [ J ]. Communications of the ACM, 2003,46 (10) : 85-89.
  • 8L W Wagenhals, I Shin, D Kim, A H Levis. C4ISR Architec- tures: A Structured Analysis Approach for Architecture Design [ J ]. Systems Engineering, 2000,3 (4) :248-287.
  • 9罗爱民.基于可执行模型的体系结构验证评估方法[J].计算机科学,2010,37(8):294-297. 被引量:18
  • 10黄力,罗爱民,邱涤珊,罗雪山,谭跃进.ATAM方法及其在C^4ISR系统体系结构评价中的应用[J].火力与指挥控制,2003,28(2):19-22. 被引量:10

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部