期刊文献+

鼻咽癌常规适形放疗与普通放疗的临床研究 被引量:3

Comparison of conventional conformal radiotherapy with conventional radiotherapy in eighty-eight patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨普通放疗与常规适形放疗在鼻咽癌治疗中的近期疗效及放疗不良反应。方法  2 7例常规适形放疗 (治疗组 )患者采用英国菲利蒲公司SL 75直线加速器和SLi型直线加速器 ,以整体适形挡铅方法实施不规则野等中心照射的常规适形治疗。对照组 6 1例采用面颈联合野等常规治疗。结果 局控率 :常规适形放疗组总有效率为 96 .3% (2 6 / 2 7)。普通放疗组总有效率为 90 .2 % (5 5 / 6 1 )。两组之间总有效率无明显差异 (P >0 .0 5 )。但完全缓解率常规适形放疗组显著高于对照组 (P <0 .0 1 )。不良反应如 :口咽黏膜反应、消化道反应、骨髓抑制、急性腮腺反应及口干等症状 ,适形放疗组均好于对照组。两组比较有显著差异 (P <0 .0 1 )。结论 采用常规适形放疗在保证局控率同时 ,可减轻放疗不良反应 。 Objective To evaluate response to radiotherapy and its side effects in NPC patients treated with conventional conformal radiotherapy(CCRT) or conventional radiotherapy.Methods Eighty eight patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma(NPC) were enrolled into this clinical study.The CCRT was finished with philliph linear accelerator and isocentric technique,and the conventional radiotherapy was performed as usual.Results The CCRT group had a markedly higher complete response rate( P <0.01)although there was no significant difference of local control rates between CCRT group(26/27,96.3%) and conventional radiotherapy group(55/61,90.2%).Significant difference was also found between these two groups in terms of side effects such as acute oral mucusitis,nausea,vomiting,bone marrow inhibition and acute parotitis( P <0.01).Conclusion Compared with conventional radiotherapy,slighter radioactive injuries,higher complete response rate,and better quality of life can be achieved by CCRT in NPC patients.
出处 《重庆医学》 CAS CSCD 2004年第7期1002-1003,共2页 Chongqing medicine
关键词 鼻咽部肿瘤 适形放疗 普通放疗 nasopharyngeal carcinima conventional conformal radiotherapy conventional radiotherapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献26

  • 1张恩罴,罗伟,钱剑扬,卢杰,钟宁山,毛志达,曾祥发,黄劭敏.改进鼻咽癌放射治疗技术的研究─—(Ⅰ)靶区剂量分布[J].癌症,1996,15(2):126-129. 被引量:55
  • 2张有望 汤钊猷 等.鼻咽癌.现代肿瘤学[M].上海:上海医科大学出版社,2000.627-657.
  • 3Sanguineti G,Geara FB,Garden AS,et al. Carcinoma of the nasophynx treated by radiotherapy alone: determinants of local and regional control[J]. Int Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1997,37(5):985-986.
  • 4Durand RE, Tumor repopulation during radiotherapy: quantitation in two xenotrafted human tumors[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phy,1997,39(4) : 803-814.
  • 5Teo PM, Leung SF, Chan TW, et al. Final report of a randomized trial on altered-fractioned radiotherapy in nasopharyogeal carcinom prematurely terminated by significant increase neurologic complications[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phy, 2000,48(5):1311-1322.
  • 6Levendag PC, Schmitz PI, Jansen PP, et al. Fractionated high-doserate bracthyerapy in primary carcinoma of the nasopharynx[J]. J Clin Oncol, 1998,16(6) :2313-2320.
  • 7Teo PM, Leung SF, Fowler J, et al. Improved local conrtonl for early T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma a tale of two hospitals[J]. Radiother Oncol, 2000, 57(2):155-166.
  • 8Lang Jin Yi, et al. Teletherapy combined with selection HDR brachytherapy in the treatment of NPC[J].Activity Selectron brachytherapy Journal, 1990,4 (1):70-71.
  • 9Cmelak AJ. Cox RS. Adcer JR, et al. Radiosurgery for skull base malignancies and nasophyarygeal cacinoma[J]. Int J Radio Oncol Biol Phys, 1997,37(5):997-1003.
  • 10Xia P, Fu KK, Wong GW, et al. Comparison of treatment plans involving intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2000, 48(2): 329-337.

共引文献19

同被引文献26

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部