期刊文献+

环境规制对企业竞争力的影响 被引量:43

EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION ON FIRM COMPETIVENESS:A LITERATURE REVIEW
下载PDF
导出
摘要 除改进环境绩效外 ,环境规制对本国企业竞争力的影响也是政策制定的关键影响因素。传统假设认为环境规制会负面影响企业竞争力 ,波特假设则认为在一定条件下 ,环境规制通过创新补偿与先动优势可提高企业竞争力。本文在提出问题的基础上 ,对上述假设进行了剖析。然后讨论了该领域研究的新动向 ,即不确定性因素的存在对环境规制与企业竞争力关系的影响 ,提出环境规制能否影响企业的竞争力还依赖于企业面临的内外部条件、环境管理动机等多种因素。 The effect of environmental regulation on the competitiveness of domestic enterprisecs is a crucial factor for the decision-making of environmental policies besides improving the environmental performance. According to the traditional hypothesis, environmental regulation will negatively affect the firm competitiveness since the regulation will induce the increase of production cost. On the opposite, Porter hypothesis assumes environmental regulation will promote the competitiveness of firm competitiveness on the conditions that the regulation should be based on the market mechanism and be considered within the dynamic circumstances. The firm competitiveness will be increased through the innovation offsets and first-mover advantages. Each hypothesis has its own supporters and combats with each other. The current research has moved out of the endless quarrel and mainly focuses on such issues with recognition of the existence of uncertainties faced by the firms. Within the recent research framework, the effect of environmental regulation on the firm competitiveness also depends on the conditions inside and outside the firm, the motives of the firm's environmental management and strategic interaction between the regulator and regulated firm. The article has reviewed and analysied the relevant literatures.
作者 张嫚
出处 《中国人口·资源与环境》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第4期126-130,共5页 China Population,Resources and Environment
基金 国家社会科学基金资助项目 ( 0 2CJY0 19)
关键词 环境规制 企业竞争力 传统假设 波特假设 策略性分析 environmental regulation, firm competitiveness,traditional and Porter Hypothesis,strategic analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Jaffe A B, Peterson S R , Portney P R, Stavins R N. Environmental Regulation and the competitiveness of U. S. Manufacttaing: What Does the Evidence Tell Us[J] .Journal of Economics Literature, 1995,33:132-163.
  • 2Maler K G.The acid rain game[C]. In: Folmer H,van Ireland E. eds. Valuation Methods and Policy Making in Environmental[A].Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1989.
  • 3Porter M E. America's green strategy[J], scientific American, 1991,(6).
  • 4Sehot Johan, Kurt Fischer. Introduction: The greening the industrial film[A]. In: Kurt Fischer:, Johan Schot. Environmental strategies for industry: International perspectives on research needs and policy implications[C]. Washington D C:Island Press, 1993.
  • 5Walley N, Whitehead B.It's not easy being green[J].Harvard Business Review, 1994,72(3).
  • 6Albrecht Johan. Environmenyal regulation, comparative advantage and the porter hypothesis[M]. Milan:FEEM Nota dl Lavoro, 1997.
  • 7Alpay S.Can environmental regulations be compatible with higher international competitiveness? Some new theoretical insights[M]. Milan: FEEM Nora di Lavoro,2001.
  • 8Barbera A J, McConnell V D. the impact of environmental regulations on industry productiviy: direct and indirect effects[J] .Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,1990,18:50-65.
  • 9Brannlund R Y Chung et al. Emissions Trading and Prdltability: The Swedish Pulp and Paper Industry[M] .RePEc working papers, 1995.
  • 10Gray W B, Shabegian. Pollution Abatement Cost, Regulation and Plant Level Productivity[M] .Washington D C:NBER Working Paper, 1995.

同被引文献547

引证文献43

二级引证文献355

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部