期刊文献+

不同养老模式的养老成本及成本—效用分析 被引量:15

On the Cost and Cost-Utility of Different Models Provided for the Aged People
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 了解家庭养老和机构养老 2种养老模式的养老成本 ,对养老成本及成本—效用进行分析 ,探索适合中国国情的养老模式 ,为政府对老年设施的投资提供参考依据。方法 采用分层定额抽样的方法 ,分别调查家庭、机构老人的个人特征 ,慢性病患病情况 ,养老成本等 ,采用生命质量总评分作为效用指标 ,用F检验、t检验和多元回归方法进行统计分析。结果 机构养老成本比家庭养老成本高 ;老人的健康状况越差、个人月均收入越高、年龄越大 ,无论是家庭养老还是机构养老 ,其养老成本越高 ;生命质量各领域得分及总分与养老成本花费之间呈负相关。家庭养老的成本—效用优于机构养老 (F =5 2 2 0 2 ,P =0 0 0 0 )。结论 大力发展以家庭养老为主的综合性社区养老服务 ,是降低养老成本 。 Objective To understand the cost and utility of different models provided for the aged people and to provide evidence for valid investment of facilities for elders. Method The purpose sampling was used and the data of personal characteristics, chronic condition, cost and utility were collected. The short form 12 was used to assess the quality of life of 1064 aged people in families and organizations in Chengdu city. The t-test, F-test and multivariate regression methods were used to analyze data. Result The cost provided by organization was higher than that by family. Chronic condition, personal income, and age remained to be correlated with the cost. The cost-utility of family is better than that of organization. Conclusion The key steps to bring down cost of providing for the elders and promote the utility (quality of life) of the elders is to developing the comprehensive community service for the elder.
出处 《预防医学情报杂志》 CAS 2004年第4期373-376,共4页 Journal of Preventive Medicine Information
关键词 老年人 养老模式 成本 成本-效用分析 Elder Model provided for the elder Cost Cost-utility analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1洪国栋.中国的人口老龄化问题与对策思考[J].人口研究,1997,21(4):44-48. 被引量:28
  • 2李绍先,黄鸣,易国胜.武汉市部分老年人长期照护需求研究[J].中国医院管理,1998,18(2):24-26. 被引量:11
  • 3[3]Dokerty N. Hicks B. Cost - effectioness and analysis and alternative health care programs for the elderly [J] . Health Services Research, 1977, 12 (2): 190 - 203.
  • 4[4]Gerard K.An appraisal of the cost- effectiveness of alternative day care settings for frail elderly people [J] . Age & Ageing, 1988, 17 (5): 38.
  • 5刘朝杰,李宁秀,任晓晖,李俊,张骏,孙丁.36条目简明量表在中国人群中的适用性研究[J].华西医科大学学报,2001,32(1):39-42. 被引量:307
  • 6[7]J. Leighton Read. The new era quality of life assessment.Edited by S.R Walker and R.M Rosser: Quality of life: Assessment and application [M] . England: Published in the UK and Europe by MTP Press limited, 1987: 9- 50.
  • 7[8]Jones - lan - R, Higgs- Paul - F - D. Health economists and health care provision for the elderly: implicit assumptions and unstated conclusion, Gerontology: responding to an ageing society. London, 1992.
  • 8[9]Doherty - N - JG; Hicks - B - C Use of cost - effectiveness analysis in geriatric day care [J] .Gerontologist, 1975, 15:412 - 417.
  • 9[10]Everitt - Daniel - E. Cost containment and the elderly:making financial incentives more explicit [J] .Joural of Geriatric Psychiatry, 1985, 118:22-24.
  • 10[11]Ehreth- Jenifer. Cost methodology in long- term care evaluations [J] .Medical-Care-Review. Fall, 1992, 49:38- 39.

二级参考文献10

共引文献377

同被引文献137

引证文献15

二级引证文献115

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部