道乐史上南陆北寇的评价问题

The problem of the assessment of Lu Xiujing in the south and Kou Qianzhi in the north in Taoist history

寇谦之与陆修静是道乐形成期的领军人物 ,音乐学术界历来对其历史评价持“重寇轻陆”论。本文基于相关史料的深入分析 ,从史的角度及斋仪、音乐、历史传承等方面对寇陆的音乐改革活动作了比较和述评 ,由此得出“重陆轻寇”的相反结论 ,将颠倒的认识再颠倒过来。此结论不仅更切合南北朝道乐的史实 ,且与道乐历史全程所贯穿的“南盛于北、延续发展”之规律相吻合。

Lu Xiujing and Kou Qianzhi were the main leading characters in the forming period of Taoist music. In the assessment of them, scholars in music stressed Kou and ignored Lu. Based on deep analysis of concerning historic materials, the thesis compared and assessed in historic view many respects of their activities in music, such as rituals, music and transmission, and reached a conclusion of stressing Lu. This conclusion not only corresponds to historic fact of Taoist music in Northern and Southern Dynasties, but also matches the rule of South's more prosperity and longer development through the whole history of Taoist music