期刊文献+

硫酸金刚烷胺与盐酸金刚烷胺对流感病毒的作用比较 被引量:1

Inhibited effect of Amantadine sulfate compared with Amantadine hydrochloride to influenza A virus in vitro
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 比较金刚烷胺硫酸盐和盐酸盐体外对流感病毒的抑制作用。方法 采用MDCK细胞 ,测定金刚烷胺 2种盐的半数中毒浓度 (TD50 )和抑制流感病毒A3 的半数有效浓度 (IC50 )。结果 硫酸金刚烷胺和盐酸金刚烷胺对流感病毒A3的TD50 分别为 0 390± 0 0 85 μM·ml-1和 0 188± 0 0 4 2 μM·ml-1,IC50 分别为 0 0 4 8± 0 0 12 μM·ml-1和 0 0 5 6± 0 0 0 4 μM·ml-1。结论 硫酸金刚烷胺与盐酸金刚烷胺在体外对流感病毒A3 Objective To compare the anti-viruse of Amantadine sulfate with Amantadine hydrochloride to influenza A_3 virus in vitro.Methods To proliferate virus in MDCK cells, then determine the virulence by TD_(50) and investigate antiviral effects(IC_(50)) of Amantadine sulfate and Amantadine hydrochloride by determining cytopathic effect(CPE). Results Amantadine sulfate and Amantadine hydrochloride show the inhibit effect to influenza A_3 in vitro evidently, the TD_(50) is 0.390±0.085μM·ml^(-1) and 0.188±0.042μM·ml^(-1) and the IC_(50) is 0.048±0.012μM·ml^(-1) and 0.056±0.004μM·ml^(-1) respectively.Conlusion The anti-virus effects of Amantadine sulfate and Amantadine hydrochloride are similar to influenza A_3 in vitro.
作者 唐明月 张艳
出处 《齐鲁药事》 2004年第6期44-45,共2页 qilu pharmaceutical affairs
关键词 硫酸金刚烷胺 盐酸金刚烷胺 流感病毒A3抑制作用 Amantadine sulfate Amantadine hydrochloride influenza A_3 cytopathic effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献6

共引文献20

同被引文献20

  • 1许丰.毛细管气相色谱法测定硫酸金刚烷胺注射液的含量[J].安徽医学,2013,34(10):1526-1528. 被引量:3
  • 2Munoz FM,Bond NH,Maccato M,et al.Safety and immunogenicit of tetanus diphtheria and acellular pertussis(Tdap)immunization during pregnancy in mothers and infants:a randomized clinica trial[J].JAMA,2014,311(17):1760-1769.
  • 3Wurzel DF,Marchant JM,Yerkovich ST,et al.Prospective characterization of protracted bacterial bronchitis in children[J].Chest,2014,145(6):1271-1278.
  • 4Smits K,Pottier G,Smet J,et al.Different T cell memory in preadolescents after whole-cell or acellular pertussis vaccination[J].Vaccine,2013,32(1):111-118.
  • 5Fedele G,Bianco M,Ausiello CM.The virulence factors of Bordetella pertussis:talented modulators of host immune response[J].Arch Immunol Ther Exp(Warsz),2013,61(6):445-457.
  • 6Schure RM,Hendrikx LH,de Rond LG,et al.Differential T-and B-cell responses to pertussis in acellular vaccine-primed versus whole-cell vaccine-primed children 2 years after preschool acellular booster vaccination[J].Clin Vaccine Immunol,2013,20(9):1388-1395.
  • 7Berbers GA,van de Wetering MS,van Gageldonk PG,et al.Anovel method for evaluating natural and vaccine induced serological responses to Bordetella pertussis antigens[J].Vaccine,2013,31(36):3732-3738.
  • 8Wu Y,Canturk B,Jo H,et al.Flipping in the pore:discovery of dual inhibitors that bind in different orientations to the wild-type versus the amantadine-resistant S31N mutant of the influenza Avirus M2 proton channel[J].J Am Chem Soc,2014,136(52):17987-17995.
  • 9Baranovich T,Bahl J,Marathe BM,et al.Influenza A viruses of swine circulating in the United States during 2009-2014 are susceptible to neuraminidase inhibitors but show lineage-dependent resistance to adamantanes[J].Antiviral Res,2015,19(117):10-19.
  • 10咳嗽的诊断与治疗指南(2009版)[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2009,32(6):407-413. 被引量:1422

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部