期刊文献+

SF-36用于肺结核的信度、效度及敏感性评价 被引量:18

Evaluation on SF-36 to assess quality of life of patients with pulmonary tubercolosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 评价中文版SF - 36量表用于肺结核 (PTB)病人的生命质量测量的信度、效度、敏感性。方法 用自行研制的中文版SF - 36量表对肺结核病人及对照进行测量。采用Cronchbach’sα评价量表的信度 ,因子分析评价量表的效度 ,用配对t检验比较患者组和对照组的评分来评价量表的敏感性。结果 对于病人组和对照组 ,SF - 36量表效度 (因子分析聚合为 2个公因子 )、信度 (Cronchbach’sα >0 7)较好。肺结核病人各项得分均低于对照组 ,说明量表的敏感性较高。结论 中文版SF - 36量表是测量肺结核病人的生命质量的有效量表 ,但量表中个别词句的翻译仍须改动 ,并且有必要进行更大样本的调查 ,建立中国人的生命质量正常值标准 。 Objective To evaluate the reliability,validity and sensitivity of Chinese version SF-36 to assess the quality of life of PTB patients.Methods Subjects were interviewed by using Chinese version of SF-36.Validity of the scores was tested by factor analysis and reliability coefficients were estimated by Cronchbach's a with 0.7 as a standard.Sensitivity was evaluated by comparison of PTB cases and controls.Results Scores of SF-36 in both groups were valid (The patterns of correlations between 8 scales of SF-36 and rotated two factors supported it) with reliability coefficients as estimated by Cronchbach's a above 0.7.Scores of SF-36 in both groups had high sensitivity (all scales of TB patients were lower than that of the control).Conclusion Chinese version of SF-36 was a valid and reliable tool for assessment of quality of life,and cultural diversity might require slight modifications of SF-36.There was a need of large scale general health survey to produce normative data for Chinese population.
出处 《中国公共卫生》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2004年第5期537-539,共3页 Chinese Journal of Public Health
关键词 肺结核 生命质量 SF-36 信度 效度 敏感性 pulmonary tuberculosis quality of life (QoL) SF-36 reliability validity sensitivity
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Ware JE, Kosinski M. SF- 36 Physical & Mental Health Summary scales: A manual for users of Version 1 (2nd Edition)[ M ]. Lincoln.RI: Quality Metric, 2001.
  • 2Xinhua SR, Benjamin A, Lin Zhou, et al. Translation and psychometric evaluation of a Chinese version of the SF - 36 health survey in the United States [J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 199S, 51 ( 11 ): 1129 -1138.
  • 3Thumboo J, Fong KY, Chan Sp, et al. The equivalence of English and Chinese SF- 36 versions in bilingual Singapore Chinese[J].Qual Life Res, 2002 , 11(5) :495 - 503.
  • 4Ware JE Jr, Gandek B. Methods for testing data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability: the IQOLA Project[ J ]. J Clin Epidemiol,1998, 51(11) :945 - 952.
  • 5Spiter WO. State of science 1986: Qulity of life and functional status as target variables for research[J]. J chron Dis, 1987, 40:465 -471.
  • 6Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Gandek B, et al. The factor structure of the SF - 36 Health Survey in 10 countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment [J ]. J Clin Epidemiol, 1998, 51(11):1159- 1165.
  • 7Shunichi F, Seiji B, Joseph G, et al. Translation, adaptation, and validation of SF- 36 health survey for use in Japan[J]. J Clin Epidemiol , 1998 , 51(11 ): 1137 - 1144.
  • 8王钊 吴明江.全国结核病防治工作手册[M].北京:卫生部疾病控制司,1999.16-19.
  • 9李鲁,王红妹,沈毅.SF-36健康调查量表中文版的研制及其性能测试[J].中华预防医学杂志,2002,36(2):109-113. 被引量:2107

二级参考文献15

  • 1Ware JE Jr, Snow KK, Kosinski M, et al.SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide.Boston: New England Medical Center the Health Institute,1993.1-12.
  • 2Perneger TV, Leplege A, Etter JF,et al.Validation of a French-language version of the MOS 36-Item Short Form Health Survey(SF-36) in young healthy adults.J Clin Epidemiol, 1995,48:1051-1060.
  • 3Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D.Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines.J Clin Epidemiol, 1993,46:1417-1432.
  • 4Gandek B, Ware JE Jr.Methods for validating and norming translations of health status questionnaires: the IQOLA Project approach.International Quality of Life Assessment.J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51:953-959.
  • 5顾杏元,金丕焕.直线回归与相关.见: 金丕焕,主编.医用统计方法.上海:上海医科大学出版社,1993.115-119.
  • 6Lam CL, Gandek B, Ren XS, et al.Tests of scaling assumptions and construct validity of the Chinese(HK) version of the SF-36 Health Survey.J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51:1139-1147.
  • 7Ren XS, Amick B 3rd, Zhou L, et al.Translation and psychometric evaluation of a Chinese version of the SF-36 Health Survey in the United States.J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51:1129-1138.
  • 8Till JE, Osoba D, Pater JL, et al.Research on health-related quality of life: dissemination into practical applications.Qual Life Res, 1994,3:279-283.
  • 9Mathias SD, Fifer SK, Patrick DL.Rapid translation of quality of life measures for international clinical trials: avoiding errors in the minimalist approach.Qual Life Res, 1994,3:403-412.
  • 10Armor DJ.Theta reliability and factor scaling.In: Costner HL, ed.Sociological Methodology:1973-74.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass,1974.17-50.

共引文献2113

同被引文献210

引证文献18

二级引证文献159

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部