期刊文献+

大陆法系、英美法系刑事审前程序构造之比较

A Comparison of the Pre-trial Penal Procedures Structure between Continental Law System and Anglo-American Law System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 大陆法系国家基于控制犯罪的考虑和“国家高于市民社会”的诉讼理念 ,奉行“职权主义”的诉讼构造 ,普遍实行侦检一体化 ,“起诉法定主义”和“卷宗移送主义”等法律制度 ;英美法系国家则遵循“市民社会先于国家”的诉讼价值观 ,践行“当事人主义”的诉讼构造 ,大多实行检警分立 ,“起诉便宜主义”和“起诉状一本主义”等法律制度。 Based on the consideration of controlling crime and the litigation notion that 'the state outweighs the civil society', countries applying continental law practice a litigious structure of 'ex officio doctrine', and most of these countries vest the powers of investigation and prosecution in the same legal body, and they will also practice such law doctrines as 'Legally Prescribed Prosecution' and 'Deportation of Files'. By contrast, countries applying Anglo-American law comply with the litigation notion that 'the civil society outweighs the state' and practice the litigious structure of 'adversary proceedings', and most of them vest the powers of prosecution and investigation in different legal bodies, and they will also carry out such law systems as 'Doctrine of Prosecuting Discretion' and 'Elusiveness of the Bill of Prosecution'. The conflict and mingling of the two major law systems disclose the feature and development tendency of modern penal actions.
作者 吴辉
出处 《广西民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第5期160-164,共5页 Journal of Guangxi University For Nationalities(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
关键词 法系 刑事审前程序 构造 比较 law system the pre-trial penal procedure structure comparison
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1[3](美)埃尔曼著,贺卫方译.比较法律文化[M].北京:三联书店,1990.
  • 2[4]詹姆斯·M·伯恩斯.美国式民主[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1993.
  • 3特德.杰斯特,李宗祥.我们与犯罪作斗争一直失败[J].国外法学,1982(3):26-30. 被引量:24
  • 4[9]谢诺平.刑事诉讼模式与精神[M].四川:成都科技大学出版社,1994.
  • 5王以真.外国刑事诉讼法学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1990.378,246.
  • 6宋英辉,张建港.刑事程序中警、检关系模式之探讨[J].政法论坛,1998,16(2):64-70. 被引量:63
  • 7毛建平,万毅.我国检警关系的反思和定位[J].检察论丛,2002,(5).

二级参考文献1

  • 1王以真.外国刑事诉讼法学[M]北京大学出版社,1990.

共引文献97

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部