期刊文献+

长白山四种林分土壤CO_2释放通量的研究 被引量:22

Soil CO_2 flux in several typical forests of Mt.Changbai.
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对长白山地区 4种典型林分下土壤释放CO2 通量的研究表明 ,在较短的时间尺度上 ,4种林型在CO2 释放通量上有显著的差别 ,各林型CO2 通量的释放表现出明显的空间异质性 ,其释放顺序为 :山杨白桦混交林 >原始阔叶红松林 >白桦林 >山杨林 ,其中山杨白桦混交林对CO2 释放的贡献最大 ,而山杨林最小。 4种林分土壤CO2 通量的全日变化过程并不一致 ,除山杨白桦混交林和气温有较一致性的规律 ,呈较明显的单峰型外 ,其余并无明显的变化规律。凋落物对林地CO2 释放通量的变化有显著的影响 ,有凋落物覆盖的林地土壤CO2 释放量明显大于无凋落物覆盖的林地 ,其平均通量为 2 6 2 86~ 5 5 6 5 5mgC·m-2 ·h-1,而无凋落物覆盖林地土壤CO2 的平均通量为 2 0 5 85~ 395 6 9mg·m-2 ·h-1。凋落物排放CO2 量占林地总排放量的14 %~ 30 % ,并且改变了林地CO2 释放通量大小的排序。 The soil CO 2 flux of four temperate forest types was studied in Mt.Changbai. The soil CO 2 flux in the four typical forests was significantly different at short time scale. The released CO 2 flux of the four typical forest indicated obvious spatial heterogeneity. The rate of released CO 2 flux was the highest in Populus-Betula mixed forest and the lowest in populus forest. The sequence was: Populus-Betula mixed forest > broad leaved-Korean pine forest > Betula forest > Populus forest. Daily course of soil CO 2 flux was very different in the four forest types. Except for Populus-Betula mixed forest, in which the changes of CO 2 flux exhibited a single peak and showed relative consistency with changes of temperature, there were no regular changes of CO 2 flux in other forest types. The litter influenced the CO 2 flux significantly in each forest type. The CO 2 flux in the forest where soil was covered with litter was higher than that with out litter. The average value was 262.86~556.55 mgC·m -2·h -1 in the forests with the litter and 205.85~395.69 mg·m -2·h -1 in the forests without litter. The contribution of litter to total soil CO 2 flux was 14 %to 30%.
出处 《生态学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2004年第5期42-45,共4页 Chinese Journal of Ecology
基金 中国科学院知识创新工程重大项目(KZCX1-SW-01) 国家重点基础研究发展规划资助项目(2002CB412502)。
关键词 长白山 林分 CO2通量 Changbai Mountains, forests, CO 2 flux.
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1[8]Anderson JM . 1973. Carbon dioxide evolution from two temperate, deciduous woodland soils[J]. J. Appl. Ecol., 173(10) :361~368.
  • 2[9]Buchmann N. 2000. Biotic and abiotic factors controlling soil respiration rates in Picea abies stands [J ]. Soil Biol. Biochem., 32:1625~ 1635.
  • 3[10]Carlyle JM, Than UBA. 1988. A biotic controls of soil respiration between an eighteen-year-old Pinus radiata stand in South-eastem Australia[ J ]. J. Ecol., 76: 654~ 662.
  • 4[11]Fernandez IJ. 1993. Soil carbon dioxide characteristics under different forest types and after harvest [ J ]. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer .J., 57:1115~1121.
  • 5[12]Houghton RA, Davidson EA, Woodwell GM. 1998. Missing sink, feedbacks, and understanding the role of terrestrial ecosystems in the global carbon balance [ J ]. Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 12:25~34.
  • 6[13]Kucera C, Kirkham D. 1971. Soil respiration studies in tall grass prairie in Missouri[ J ]. Ecology, 52: 912~ 915.
  • 7[14]Lal M, Singh R. 2000. Carbon sequestration potential of Indian forests[ J ]. Environm. Monitor Assessm, 60: 315 ~ 327.
  • 8[15]Raich JW, James W. 2000. Vegetation and soil respiration: Correlations and controls[J]. Biogeochem., 48(1):71~91.
  • 9[16]Raich JW, Schlesinger WH. 1992. The global carbon dioxide flux in soil respiration and its relationship to vegetation and climate [J]. Tellus, 44B:81~89.

同被引文献358

引证文献22

二级引证文献443

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部