期刊文献+

受干扰长白山阔叶红松林林分组成及冠层结构特征 被引量:27

Structure of stand and canopy characteristics of disturbed communities of broadleaved Pinus koraiensis forest in Changbai Mountain
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过样地调查对不同干扰方式产生的过伐天然林、次生白桦林和人工落叶松林等群落的结构组成进行分析和分类探讨 ,并选取了林窗片断和叶面积指数两个能表示群落冠层结构的指标进行分析。结果表明 ,林窗片断值分别为 :原始阔叶红松林 0 194、原始阔叶类 0 185、结构转换型 0 315、结构保留型 0 36 3、结构破坏型 0 2 35、严重干扰类型 0 5 5 0、次生白桦林0 2 13和人工落叶松林 0 2 2 7;叶面积指数分别为 :原始阔叶红松林 1 76 6、原始阔叶类 1 6 80、结构转换型 1 2 5 0、结构保留型 1 0 2 8、结构破坏型 1 5 5 0、严重干扰类型 0 6 35、次生白桦林1 731和人工落叶松林 1 4 73。 By sampling investigation,community structures of overcut original forest,secondary birch forests and larch plantation forest caused by different disturbances had been analyzed and classified gap fraction and leaf area index,and two community canopy structure index had been analyzed.Results of gap fraction were:original broadleaved Korean pine forest (0.194),original broadleaved stand (0.185),structure switched stand (0.315),structure reserved stand (0.363),structure destroyed stand (0.235),heavy disturbed stand (0.550),secondary birch stand (0.213), and larch plantations (0.227).Results of leaf area index were:original broadleaved Korean pine forest (1.766),original broadleaved stand (1.680),structure switched stand (1.250),structure reserved stand (1.028),structure destroyed stand (1.550),heavily disturbed stand (0.635), secondary birch stand (1.731), and larch plantations (1.473).
出处 《生态学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2004年第5期116-120,共5页 Chinese Journal of Ecology
基金 国家自然科学基金资助 ( 3 0 170 744和 70 3 73 0 44 )
关键词 阔叶红松林 干扰 冠层 林窗片断 叶面积指数 broadleaved Pinus koraiensis forest,disturbance,canopy,gap fraction,leaf area index.
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1[13]Alexander SA, Palmer CJ. 1999. Forest health monitoring in the United States: first four years[J]. Environ. Monit. Assess., 55(2) :267~277.
  • 2[14]Hodges DG, Regens JL. 1996. Methodological issues in valuing forest ecosystem health [J ]. Ecosyst. Health, 2(1):52~56.
  • 3[15]Kolb TE, Wagner MR, Covington WW. 1994. Concepts of forest health-utilitarian and ecosystem perspectives [ J ]. J. For., 6:10~15.
  • 4[16]O'-Laughlin-J. 1996. Forest ecosystem health assessment issues:definition, measurement, and management implications [ J ].Ecosyst. Health, 2 (1): 19 ~ 40.
  • 5[17]Yazvenko SB, Rapport DJ. 1996. A framework for assessing forest ecosystem health [ J]. Ecosyst. Health, 2 (1): 40~ 52.

同被引文献514

引证文献27

二级引证文献320

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部