批评的历史维度

A Criticism in History

本文针对 2 0世纪文学批评领域出现的热衷于自我证明并拒绝历史语境的倾向 ,通过剖析文体学批评、道德批评、神话批评、精神分析批评和结构主义批评等五种批评方法 ,说明没有一种阐释模式是完全自足的 ,它们所谓的自主性来自阐释过程中的任意限定和设界。如果将其中的任何一种方法延伸 ,即使完全用它自身的术语 。

Faced with the tendency to refuse the context of society and history, to be fond of self-prove in criticism methods and the tending of formalism in critical field, the paper, by means of five critical methods which are stylistic analysis?ethical criticism?myth criticism?Freudianism criticism and structuralism criticism, illustrates that: none of these models of interpretation is complete in themselves, and that their appearance of autonomy results from the limits and boundaries arbitrarily during their interpretative process. If we prolong any one of these methods, even on its own terms, we always reemerge into the historical dimension itself, which thus comes as an implicit or explicit completion of all literary analysis or interpretation.