期刊文献+

基于幂指数分布的系统共因失效新模型 被引量:2

New System Reliability Model of Common Cause Failures Based on Power Exponent Distribution
下载PDF
导出
摘要 假定构成系统的元件存在多种失效过程,各失效过程相互独立,并服从非齐次泊松分布,则同一失效过程的连续两次失效事件之间的时间间隔服从幂指数分布,利用条件概率,从系统中某一指定元件完好的概率推广到某指定m个元件完好的概率,将独立失效时系统可靠度表达式转化成包含共因信息的可靠度表达式。算例验证了该理论模型的正确性。 Assuming that the components composing the system are subject to a number of different failure processes independent from each other and conforming to a non-homogeneous Poisson distribution, the time between any two successive events in one failure process is based on the power exponent distribution. Under the statistically independent component assumption, the system reliability results from the component reliability. An example is given in the paper to compare the reliability of a system with common cause failures to that with statistically-independent components.
出处 《机械制造》 北大核心 2004年第9期58-61,共4页 Machinery
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(编号:50275025)
关键词 共因失效 系统可靠性 相关失效 可靠性模型 多重失效 幂指数分布 Common Cause Failure System Reliability Related Failure Reliability Model Multiple Failure Power Exponent Distribution
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1谢里阳,林文强.共因失效概率预测的离散化模型[J].核科学与工程,2002,22(2):186-192. 被引量:25
  • 2Jussi K. Vaurio. An implicit method for incorporating common cause failures in system analysis. Transactions on reliability,1998, 47(2): 173-180
  • 3K.C. Chae, G. M. Clark. System reliability in the presence of common - cause failure. IEEE Transaction on Reliability, 1986,vol R-35:32-35
  • 4Gregory Levitin. incorporating common - Cause failures into non repairable multistate series - parallel system analysis.IEEE Transaction on reliability,2001,50(4):380-388
  • 5Lawrence M. Leemis. Lifetime Distribution Identities.IEEE Transaction on reliability,1986,vol.R-35(2):170-174
  • 6A.W. Mar4shall, I. Olkin. A multivariate exponential distribu tion. J. Amer. Statis. Assoc.,1967,vol 62:30-44

二级参考文献11

  • 1[1]Collas G. Reliability engineering for the future., In: New trends in system reliability evaluation, K. B. Misra( ed. ), Elsevier, 1993,. 325~328
  • 2[2]Vaurio J K. Common cause failure models, data, quantification,IEEE Trans. Reliability, 1999, 48:213~214
  • 3[3]Hauptmanns U. The multi-class binominal failure rate model,Reliability Eng. and System Safety, 1996, 53:85~96
  • 4[4]NEA/CSNI/R(92)18, STATE OF THE ART OF LEVEL-1 PSA METHODOLOGY, 1993
  • 5[5]Hughes R P. A New approach to Common Cause Failure. Reliability Eng., 1987, 17:211~236
  • 6[6]Dore P. Basic Aspects of Stochastic Reliability Analysis for Redundancy Systems, Reliability Eng. and System Safety,1989, 24: 351~375
  • 7[7]Mankamo T, Kosonen M. Dependent failure modeling in highly redundant structure-application to BWR safety valves. Reliability Eng. and System Safety 1992, 35: 235~244
  • 8[8]Xie L Y. Pipe Segment Failure Dependency Analysis and System Failure Probability Estimation, Int. J. Pressure Vessels and Piping, 1998.75(6) ..483~488
  • 9[9]Kaplan S. On the method of discrete probability distributions in risk and reliability calculations-application to seismic risk assessment. Risk Analysis, 1981, 1:189~196
  • 10[10]Kurth R E, Cox D C. Discrete probability distributions for probabilistic fracture mechanics. Risk Analysis, 1985, 5(3):235~240

共引文献24

同被引文献7

  • 1徐兴忠.二次损失下回归系数的线性Minimax估计[J].数学年刊(A辑),1993,1(5):621-628. 被引量:24
  • 2樊会涛.空空导弹系统试验和鉴定[M].北京:国防工业出版社,2007.
  • 3樊会涛,吕长起,林忠贤,等.空空导弹系统总体设计[M].北京:国防工业出版社,2007.
  • 4Stamatelatos M. Probabilistic Risk Assessment Procedures Guide for NASA Managers and Ppractitioners [ M ]. Washington D. C : Office of Safety and Mission Assurance, NASA Headquarters ,2002.
  • 5GJB451A-2005.可靠性维修性保障性术语[S].2005.
  • 6范盛金.一元三次方程的新求根公式与新判别法.海南师范学院学报:自然科学版,1989,2(2):91-98.
  • 7喻胜华,何灿芝.一般Gauss-Markov模型中可估函数的线性Minimax估计[J].应用概率统计,2003,19(2):203-209. 被引量:7

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部