期刊文献+

临床对照试验文献质量评价的发展与现状 被引量:10

Development and Current Condition of Quality Assessment for Clinical Controlled Trial Reports
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :介绍临床试验文献质量评价的发展与现状。方法 :检索相关文献进行描述性研究。结果 :临床试验文献质量越来越受到重视 ,国外有不少于 2 5种评价临床试验文献质量的量表 ,其中CONSORT声明、Jadal量表、Delphi清单和Chalmers量表应用较多。结论 :评价临床试验文献质量有多种量表。还存在多量表共存。 Objective: To review the development and current condition of evaluation of clinical control trial reports.Method: descriptive study by reviewing the related articles published.Result: More attention has been paid to the quality of clinical trial reports, and there are at least 25 kinds of method on assessing report quality, some of them are used more common such as CONSORT statement, Jadal questionnaire, Delphi list and Chalmers scale.Conclusion: Quite some kinds of methods are developed to evaluate the reports, in which, however, various limitations still exist, such as coexistence of various quality assessment methods, evaluation of validity of the method and the program to form the scale.
出处 《药物流行病学杂志》 CAS 2004年第4期211-214,共4页 Chinese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology
关键词 临床试验 文献质量 评价 量表 Clinical trials Literature quality Evaluation measuring scale
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1俞国培,高思维,李怡,龚微.中药临床治疗试验质量的调查──314篇文献评阅结果[J].中国中西医结合杂志,1994,14(1):50-52. 被引量:6
  • 2Verhagen AP, Henica CW, Robert A, et al. A criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus [J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51:1035-1241
  • 3Jadal AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reporters of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary[J] ? Controlled Clinical Trials, 1996,17:1-12
  • 4Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlation: use in assessing rater reliability[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1979,86:420-428
  • 5Rooyen SV, Godlee F, Evans S, et al . Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review: a randomized trial[J]. JAMA, 1998,280:234-237
  • 6Juni P, Witschi A, Bloch R, et al. The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis[J]. JAMA,1999,282: 1054-1060
  • 7Cho MK, Bero LA. Instruments for assessing the quality of drug studies published in the medical literature[J]. JAMA,1994,272: 101-104
  • 8Moher D, Jadal AR, Nichol G, et al. Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: an annotated bibliography of scales and checklists[J]. Controlled Clin Trials, 1995,16:62-73
  • 9Begg Colin, Cho M, Eastwood S, et al. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: the CONSORT statement [J]. JAMA, 1996,276: 637-639
  • 10Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reporting of parrallel-group randomized trials [J]. The Lancet, 2001,357:1191-1194

二级参考文献6

  • 1洪明晃.临床试验.医学科研的设计、测量、评价(第一版)[M].广州:中山大学出版社,1994.22-38.
  • 2陈彬 王家良.临床差异与统计学差异的分析与评价.临床流行病学(第一版)[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1990.225-37.
  • 3汪复 陈灏珠.临床药理学的发展概况和任务.实用内科学(上册,第10版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1997.120.
  • 4汪复,实用内科学.上(第10版),1997年,120页
  • 5洪明晃,医学科研的设计、测量、评价,1994年,22页
  • 6陈彬,临床流行病学,1990年,225页

共引文献11

同被引文献144

引证文献10

二级引证文献77

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部