期刊文献+

普斯陶伊(Pusztai)事件及其思考 被引量:5

Pusztai Affair and the Thoughts on It
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文对98年英国引发转基因食品安全性争论的Pusztai事件进行了梳理并澄清了一些误解,展现了大科学时代科学研究与商业资本、政府、环保组织和公众之间的关系并作出分析,通过这一事件的复杂性表明了科学研究存在利益冲突、具有价值负载,表明了科学家角色的变化。 In 1998 Pusztai Affair aroused debate about the safety of genetically modified food in the Britain. The article describes the process of Pusztai affair, clarifies some misunderstandings of it and tries to represent and analyze the relationship among scientific research, commercial capital, government, environmental organizations and the public in Big Science Times. The complexity of the Pusztai Affair indicates the conflicts of interest in scientific research, value-ladenness of science and the change of the role of scientists.
作者 何玲
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第8期91-95,共5页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
关键词 Pusztai事件 转基因食品 食品安全 英国皇家学会 动物实验 Pusztai affair conflict of interest the royal society Rowett Research Institute The Lancet
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1朱祯,刘翔.转基因作物—恶魔还是救星[J].农业生物技术学报,2000,8(1):1-5. 被引量:56
  • 2贾士荣,金芜军.国际转基因作物的安全性争论——几个事件的剖析[J].农业生物技术学报,2003,11(1):1-5. 被引量:38
  • 3(美)丹尼尔·查尔斯 袁丽琴译.收获之神[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2004.283.286.
  • 4林益仁.众声喧哗的GM科学论战.生物科技与法律研究通讯,1999,(3):33-33.
  • 5Robin McKie . Why Britain's Scientific Establishment Got so Ratty with A Gentle Boffin [ N ]. The Guardian, Oct.17, 1999.
  • 6Martin Enserink . Preliminary Data Touch Off Genetic Food Fight[ J ] . Science, 1999, 283 (5405): 1094-1095.
  • 7Andy Coghian. Humble Pie all Round—The Saga of Genetically Altered Potatoes Has Turned fnto A Farce [ J ]. New Scientist, 1998, 159 (2148): 24.
  • 8New Scientist . Anatomy of A Food Scare[J]. New Scientist, 1999, 161(2174): 4-5.
  • 9Ehsan Masood. … and Blair Resists Demands for A Moratorium [J]. Nature, 1999, 397(6720): 547.
  • 10Richard Horton. Secret Society-Scientific Peer Review and Pusztai' s Potatoes [ N ]. Times Literary Supplement, Dec. 17, 1999.

二级参考文献6

共引文献91

同被引文献91

  • 1罗玲玲,王刚.农作物转基因技术的三重价值分析[J].东北大学学报(社会科学版),2012,14(5):377-381. 被引量:1
  • 2黄季焜,仇焕广,白军飞,Carl Pray.中国城市消费者对转基因食品的认知程度、接受程度和购买意愿[J].中国软科学,2006(2):61-67. 被引量:129
  • 3Tait, J. , Chataway, J. The Governance of Corporations, Technological Change, and Risk: Examining Industrial Perspectives on the Development of Genetically Modified Crops[J]. Enviromnent and Planning C: Government and Policy. 2007(1).
  • 4Chataway, J., Tait, J., Wield, D. Understanding Company R&D Strategies in Agro- biotechnology: Trajectories and Blind Spots[J]. Research Policy. 2004( 1 ).
  • 5Teece, D. ,Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy [J]. Research Policy. 1986(6).
  • 6Tait, J. ,Risk Governance of Genetically Modified Crops in Europe: Decision Nodes and Incubation Periods in Generating A Risk Governance Deficit [R]. International Risk Governance Council, 2009 : 4 - 5.
  • 7Tait, J. ,Systemic Interactions in Life Science Innovation [J]. Technology Analysis. 2007(3).
  • 8Tait, J., More Faust than Frankenstein: the European Debate about the Precautionary Principle and Risk Regulation for Genetically Modified Crops [J]. Journal of Risk Research. 2001(2).
  • 9COMEST, UNESCO. 预防原则[R].2005:14.
  • 10Tait, J., Levidow, L. The Case of Biotechnology [J]. Futures. 1992(3).

引证文献5

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部