期刊文献+

应用皮肤试验抑制指数评价阿伐斯汀的起效时间

Evaluation on onset time of acrivastine assayed with skin test inhibition index
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的皮肤试验抑制指数(Skin Test Inhibition Index,STII)是评价抗组胺药疗效的一个药效学指标,本试验以阿伐斯汀为例应用STII方法评价抗组胺药阿伐斯汀的起效时间。方法选择27例花粉症病人,分为阿伐斯汀组(24例)和安慰剂组(3例),并分别于服药前及服药30、90min后观察受试者的过敏原皮试反应,计算STII值,并将STII达到10的时间定为起效时间。结果安慰剂组前后过敏原皮试风团无显著差异,而阿伐斯汀组30、90min后,STII值分别为22.2、237.7。故可初步认为阿伐斯汀的起效时间小于30min。结论 STII可做为评价抗组胺药起效时间的客观指标之一。 objective Skin Test Inhibition index(STⅡ) is an pharmacodynamic assay method to evaluate the curative effect of antihistamine which is reliable and sensitive. STⅡ was used to assess the onset time of acrivastine in this investigation. Method 27 subjects with hay fever in off-season were selected. Subjects were divided into acrivastine group (24) or placebo control group (3). Artemisia allergen skin test were carried out before and after treatment in 30、90 minutes. The wheal reactions were recorded and calculated. According to STⅡ method, the STⅡ value were computed. The time needed to reach STⅡ 10 was defined as the onset time. Result The wheal showed no significant changes in placebo controlled subjects. The wheal size induced by Artemisia pollen extract where significantly inhibited after acrivastine treatment. The STⅡ were 22.2 and 237.7 after acrivastine administration in 30、90 minutes respectively. Therefor the onest time of acrivastine was within 30 minutes. Conclusion STⅡ can be an objective index to evaluate the onset time of antihistamines.
出处 《临床药物治疗杂志》 2004年第5期50-52,共3页 Clinical Medication Journal
关键词 皮肤试验抑制指数 阿伐斯汀 起效时间 抗组胺药 药效学 skin test inhibition index skin test Acrivastine antihistamine
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1[1]Downs SH, Marks GB, Sporik R, et al. Continued increase in the prevalence of asthma and atopy. Arch Dis Child, 2001,84: 20~23. Ⅲ
  • 2[2]Bateman DN, Chapman PH, Rawlins MD. The effect of astemizole on histamine-induced wheal and flare. Eur J Clin Pharmacol,1983, 25:547~550
  • 3[3]Petersen LJ, Bindslev-Jensen C, Poulsen LK, et al. Time of onset of action of acrivastine in the skin of pollen-allergic subjects.Allergy, 1994, 49:27~30
  • 4支玉香,张宏誉.咪唑斯汀和氯雷他定起效指数的研究[J].中华皮肤科杂志,2003,36(7):407-408. 被引量:5
  • 5张宏誉,何海娟,张茸,杨秀敏,岳凤敏.应用皮肤试验抑制指数评价抗组胺药物的疗效[J].中国医学科学院学报,1992,14(2):110-113. 被引量:4
  • 6[6]Simons. Comparative pharmacology of H1 antihistamine: clinical relevance. AmJMed, 2002, 113 (Suppl9) A: S38~S46

二级参考文献5

  • 1蒋萍,闫玉兰,张宏誉.点刺皮肤试验的组胺阳性对照及临床意义[J].中华微生物学和免疫学杂志,2001,21(S2):84-86. 被引量:11
  • 2张宏誉.新敏乐治疗急性和慢性荨麻疹的临床观察[J].中华皮肤科杂志,1995,28(4):276-277. 被引量:7
  • 3Juhlin L. A comparison of the pharmacodynamics of H1-receptor antagonists as assessed by the induced wheal-and-flare model. Allergy, 1995, 50 (24 Suppl ): 24-30.
  • 4Kontou-Fili K. Clinical advantages of dual activity in urticaria. Allergy, 2000, 55 Suppl 64: 28-33.
  • 5Grant JA, Riethuisen JM, Moulaert B, et al.A double-blind, randomized, single-dose,crossover comparison of Ievocetirizine with ebastine, fexofenadine, loratadine, mizolastine, and placebo: suppression of histamine -induced wheal-and-flare response during 24 hours in healthy male subjects. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, 2002, 88:190-197.

共引文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部