期刊文献+

转基因大米的免疫毒理学评价 被引量:9

Immunotoxicologic assessment on transgenic rice
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 观察转基因大米对小鼠免疫功能的影响。方法 将Balb/c小鼠随机分为 4组 ,即转基因大米组、非转基因大米对照组、美国营养学会配方饲料 (AIN93G)正常对照组和阳性对照组 ,相应饲料喂养 30d ,比较各组小鼠免疫功能改变情况。结果 转基因大米组 ,所有观察指标与非转基因大米组相比均无显著性差异 ;与AIN93G组相比 ,脾脏 /体比值、自然杀伤 (NK)细胞活性高于AIN93G组 ,其余指标无显著性差异。阳性对照组的各项指标 ,绝大多数均显著低于其他 3组。结论 转基因大米在小鼠免疫毒理学方面的评价是安全的。 Objective To observe the immunotoxicologic effects of transgenic rice on mice.Methods The Balb/c mice were divided into four groups,transgenic rice group (Xa group),non- transgenic rice control group (N group),AIN93G control group (A group) and positive control group (P group).The mice were fed with corresponding food for 30 days.The immunity indicators of mice were compared.Results The indicators were as fellows: body weight,blood routine test,lymphocyte sort,lymphocyte transform test,immunity organ index,delayed hypersensitivity response,antibody forming test,serum antibody titter,macrophage function test and NK cell activity test.All indicators between Xa group and N group were no statistic difference.The spleen index and NK cell activity in Xa group were higher than those in A group and the other indicators were no statistic difference each other.Most of all indicators in P group were lower than that in the other groups.Conclusion The immunotoxicologic effects of transgenic rice on mice were safe.
出处 《中国公共卫生》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2004年第4期404-406,共3页 Chinese Journal of Public Health
基金 国家科技部863计划(AA2212291) 国家科技部973计划(2001CB109007) 科技部国家转基因植物研究与产业化专项(J00-C-003)
关键词 转基因大米 免疫毒理 安全评价 transgenic rice immunotoxicologic safety assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1[1]Philip G, Reeves, Forrest H, et al.AIN - 93G purified diets for laboratory rodents; final report of the American Institute of Nutrition Ad Hoc Writing Committee on the reformulation of the AIN - 76A rodent diet[R]. 1993. 1939 - 1951.
  • 2[3]Keiko Momma, Wataru Hashlmoto, Hye - Jin Yoon, et al. Safety assessment of rice genetically modified with soybean glycinin by feeding studies on rats [ J ]. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem, 2000, 64(9):1881- 1886.
  • 3[4]Bruc G Hammond. John L Vicini, Gary F Hartnell, et al. The feeding value of soybeans fed to rats, chickens, catfish and dairy cattle is not altered by genetic incorporation of glyphosate tolerance [ J ].Amercian J Nntr, 1996. 717 - 727.
  • 4[5]Teshima R, Watanabe T, Okunuki H, et al. Effect of subchronic feeding of genetically modified com ( CBH351 ) on immune system in BN rats and B10A mice[J]. Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zasshi, 2002, 43:273 - 279.

同被引文献137

引证文献9

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部