债务承担新探

New Research of Debts Assumption

传统债法理论及立法例在对债务承担进行分类和制度设计时 ,混淆了两类不同的划分标准 ,理论和立法都存在一定的缺陷。本文通过比较分析 ,认为债务承担以第三人承担的量和质为标准 ,综合分为全部承担、部分承担和连带承担 ,并在探讨相关理论基础上提出对《合同法》第 84条的修改建议。

There are some defects in the traditional theories and legislation of classification and systematic design of debt assumption. The thesis thinks that the debt assumption should be standardized with the quantity and quality of third party's debt assumption, classifying as total assumption, partial assumption and implicative assumption.\;