1[1]Longo A. Treatment of haemorrhoids disease by reduction of mucosa and haemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular-suturing device: a new procedure. Proceedings of the Sixth World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery, Rome, 1998:777~784
2[2]Beattie GC, Loudon MA. Circumferential stapled anoplasty in the management of haemorrhoids and mucosal prolapse. Colorectal Disease, 2000; 2(3):7~12
3[3]Mehigan B, Monson JRT, Hartley JE. Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2000; 355(9206):782~785
4[4]Rowsell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM. Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2000; 355(9206):779~781
5[5]Shalaby R, Desoky A. Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg, 2001; 88(8):1049~1053
6[6]Beattie GC, Loudon MA. Follow-up confirms sustained benefit of circumferential stapled anoplasty in the management of prolapsing haemorrhoids. Br J Surg, 2001; 88(6):850~852
7[7]Beattie GC, Lam PH, Loudon MA. A prospective evaluation of the introduction of circumferential stapled anoplasty in the management of haemorrhoids and mucosal prolapse. Colorectal Dis, 2000; 2(3):1~6
8[8]Seow-Choen F. Stapled haemorrhoidectomy: pain or gain. Br J Surg, 2001; 88(1):1~3
9[9]Altomare DF, Rinaldi M, Chiumarulo C et al. Treatment of external anorectal mucosal prolapse with circular stapler: an easy and effective new surgical technique. Dis Colon Rectum, 1999;42(8):1102~1105
10[10]Molloy RG and Kingsmore D. Life threatening pelvic sepsis after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet, 2000; 355(9206):810