期刊文献+

大跨桥梁结构状态评估方法研究进展 被引量:32

Progress in condition assessment methods for long span bridges
下载PDF
导出
摘要 简要回顾了国内外结构状态评估理论的发展 ,在此基础上 ,对蒙特卡罗法、层次分析法等桥梁结构常用的状态评估方法进行了介绍和比较 .结合润扬大桥悬索桥 (国内最大跨度的悬索桥 )及苏通大桥 (世界在建最大跨度的斜拉桥 )中的状态评估系统 ,介绍了该系统的功能以及模块构成 .最后阐述了状态评估领域的主要研究问题和发展方向 . The progress in structure condition assessment is briefly reviewed, and based on this, the general methods of bridge condition assessment are introduced and compared, including Monte Carlo method and analytical hierarchy process, etc. Combined with the introduction to the condition assessment system on Runyang Bridge which is the longest suspension bridge in China and Sutong Bridge which is the longest cable-stayed bridge in the world, the function and its constitution of this system are discussed in detail. The main problems in probability analysis and the development of condition assessment are presented.
出处 《东南大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2004年第5期699-704,共6页 Journal of Southeast University:Natural Science Edition
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目 (5 0 3 780 17) .
关键词 状态评估 健康监测 结构可靠度 Artificial intelligence Cable stayed bridges Monte Carlo methods Reliability State estimation
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Bergmeister K, Santa U. Global monitoring concepts for bridges[A].In: Nondestructive Evaluation of Highways, Utilities, and Pipe-lines IV, Proceedings of SPIE[C].Newport Beach, USA, 2000, 3995:14-25.
  • 2Wong K Y, Chan W Y K, Man K L. The use of structural health monitoring system in operation & maintenance of cable supported bridges[A].In: One Day Annual Seminar Structural Symposium 2000 Highway and Railway Structures[C]. Hong Kong, 2000. 108-133.
  • 3Aktan A E, Farhey D N, Brown D L, et al. Condition assessment for bridge management [J].ASCE Infrastruct Systems, 1996, 2(3):108-117.
  • 4Andersen E Y. Structural monitoring of the great belt east bridge[A]. In: Krokeborg J,ed. Proceedings of Third Symposium on Strait Crossing[C]. Rotterdam:Balkema,1994. 52-62.
  • 5Muria V D, Gomez R, King C. Dynamic properties of cable stayed Tampico Bridge. [J]. Journal of Structural Engineering,ASCE, 1991, 117(11):3396-3416.
  • 6Housner G W, Bergman L A, Caughey T K, et al. Structural control: past, present, and future [J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 1997,123(9): 897-971.
  • 7Wang J Y, Ko J M, Ni Y Q. Modal sensitivity analysis of Tsing Ma Bridge for structural damage detection [A]. In: Aktan A E, ed. Nondestructive Evaluation of Highways, Utilities, and Pipelines [C]. Newport Beach, 2000, 3995: 300-311.
  • 8李兆霞,李爱群,陈鸿天,郭力,周太全.大跨桥梁结构以健康监测和状态评估为目标的有限元模拟[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2003,33(5):562-572. 被引量:119
  • 9李爱群,缪长青,李兆霞,韩晓林,吴胜东,吉林,杨玉冬.润扬长江大桥结构健康监测系统研究[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2003,33(5):544-548. 被引量:164
  • 10孙光亮.多层次综合评判模型及其应用[J].系统工程,1996,14(2):62-67. 被引量:28

二级参考文献50

  • 1赵永翔,张质文.以可靠度观点确定起重机金属结构许用应力[J].机械强度,1994,16(1):61-64. 被引量:10
  • 2吕澎民,严隽耄.焊接转向架结构可靠性疲劳寿命预估方法研究[J].兰州铁道学院学报,1995,14(3):80-86. 被引量:4
  • 3沈惠申,王宇新.斜拉桥主梁静动力可靠性分析[J].中国公路学报,1996,9(1):59-65. 被引量:20
  • 4江仪贞.水工混凝土建筑物老化、病害防治及评估的研究学术报告(上卷)[M].,1996..
  • 5Fritzen C P Zhu S.Updating of finite element models by means of measured information [J].Computers Structures,1991,40(2):475-486.
  • 6Hibibit Karlsson Sorensen Inc.ABAQUS/Standard User''s Manual HKS Inc Ver 6.3[M].USA: HKS Inc,2002..
  • 7周太全.[D].南京:东南大学土木工程学院,2000.
  • 8Wang B S, Liang X B, NiYQ, etal. Comparative study of damage indices in application to a ling-span suspension bridge[A]. In: Ko J M, Xu Y L, eds.proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Strctural Dynamics[C].Hong Kong:the Hongkong Polytechnic University,2000.1085-1092
  • 9Stubbs N, Kim J T. Damage localization in structures without baseline model parameters[J].AIAA J, 1996, 34(8) : 1644-1649.
  • 10Salawu O S. Detection of structural through changes in frequency: a neview [J]. Engineering Structures, 1997,19(9) : 718 - 723.

共引文献470

同被引文献266

引证文献32

二级引证文献183

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部