期刊文献+

欧洲法院司法解释的方法论 被引量:3

The Interpretative Methodology of the European Court of Justice
原文传递
导出
摘要 欧洲法院作为欧共体的司法机关 ,在欧共体的建设与发展乃至欧洲一体化之进程中所发挥的重大作用 ,是其他任何国际司法机关所无法比拟的。欧洲法院在其司法实践中 ,为实现其所意欲推进的政策目标 ,确立和发展了一整套司法解释的方法论。该方法论不仅丰富了欧共体法律制度本身 。 The European Court of Justice(ECJ)——the judicial organ of the Communitiy,has been playing an unique role in the establishment and the development of the Community as well as in the process of European integration.To promote the policy goal it intends to carry out,the ECJ has established its own interpretative methodology through its judicial practice,which is not only enriched the Community legal system itself,but also challenged strongly to the theory and practice of traditional international law.
作者 张英
机构地区 深圳大学法学院
出处 《欧洲》 CSSCI 北大核心 2001年第5期101-105,共5页 Europe
关键词 欧洲法院 字面解释方法 体系解释方法 目的论 司法激进主义 the European Court of Justice(ECJ) Purposive or Teleological Interpretation Judicial Activism
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Case 302187 European Parliament v. Council (Comitology) [1988]ECR 5615,5644.
  • 2Case 36/77, AlMA v. GRECO [ 1977 ] ECR 2059,2071.
  • 3Case 131/86, UK v. Council [ 1988 ] ECR 905,932, [1988]2 CMLR 364.
  • 4Case C-292/89, R. v. Immigration Appeal Tribunal, exp. Antonissen [ 1991 ] ECR 1-745, [ 1991 ] 2 CMLR 373.
  • 5Case 283/81, CILFIT v. Italian Ministry of Health [ 1982 ] ECR 3415,3430, [ 1983 ] I CMLR 428.
  • 6Case 2,3/62, Commission v Luxembourg and Belgium[ 1962 ] ECR 425, [ 1963 ] CMLR 199.
  • 7Case 8/74 Procureue du Roi v Dassonville[ 1974]ECR 837, [1974]2 CMLR 436.
  • 8Case 75/63, Hoekstra v Bedrijfsvereniging Detailhandel[ 1964 ] [ 1964 ] ECR 177, ECR 625, [ 1965 ][ 1964] CMLR 546.CMLR 58.
  • 9Case 26/62, Van Gend en Loos v. Nederlandse Administratie der Belasfingen [ 1963 ] ECR 1, p.12,CMLR 105;
  • 10Case 6/64, Costa (Flaminio)v. ENEL[ 1964 ] ECR 585 ; [ 1964 ] CMLR 425.

同被引文献67

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部