期刊文献+

两类线索相容性的比较研究 被引量:4

COMPARISON BETWEEN CUE-S COMPATIBILITY AND CUE-R COMPATIBILITY
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究运用前置线索的实验模式,采用对颜色刺激进行不一致颜色命名的实验任务,考察了线索与刺激和反应的维度重合关系、线索的呈现时距和线索的有效概率对命名时间的影响。研究表明:在无刺激-反应相容性的情况下,当线索-刺激和线索-反应这两类线索相容性同时存在却相互竟争时,线索-刺激的相容性强于线索-反应的相容性,只显示出线索-刺激的相容性效应。同时,实验结果证明了线索-刺激相容性效应仍然遵循适时性的特征,受到线索呈现时距的影响,并随线索客观有效概率的增加而增强。 In this study, the differences between Cue-Stimulus Compatibility (CSC) and Cue-Response Compatibility (CRC) were investigated within a precueing paradigm when the experimental task was inconsistent color naming. 18 college students participated in the experiment voluntarily and were paid after the experiment The results showed that the CSC was stronger than CRC when they conflicted. So only the CSC effects were found in the experiment. Results were the same as found in previous studies, the CSC was influenced by the time duration between cue and stimulus and the probability of the cues. The serial researches on cue compatibility, including the CSC, the CRC and the comparison between them supplied evidences to prove the efficiency of DOM, in which the compatibility is a basic feature of information processing
作者 刘艳芳 张侃
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2001年第2期132-136,共5页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
基金 中国科学院院长基金的资助.
关键词 前置线索 相容性 客观有效慨率 cue compatibility, automatic activation, valid probability.
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1刘艳芳.S-R相容性:概念、分类、理论假设及应用[J].心理科学,1996,19(2):105-109. 被引量:1
  • 2[2]Sylvan Komblum, Thirty Hasbroucq, Allen Osman.Dimensional Overlap: Cognitive Basis for Stimulus-Response Compatibility-A Model and Taxonomy. Psychological Review,1990, 97(2):253-270
  • 3刘艳芳.S—R相容性的最新理论研究[J].心理科学,1998,21(6):562-563. 被引量:2
  • 4[6]Jos J Adam, Loe M A. Veggel. Manipulating procedural variables in a spatial precuing task. Acta Psychologica,1992, 81:97-114
  • 5[7]A J P Herrikx. Compatibility of Precuing and of S-R Mapping in Choice Reactions. Acta Psychologica, 1986:59-88
  • 6[8]Ritske de Jong. Strategical determinants of compatibility effects with task uncertainty. Acta Psychologica, 1995: 187-207
  • 7[9]Domier L A, Reeve T G. Evaluation of mental representation for same and mixed compatibility assignments.Perception and Psychophysics, 1996, 58(l):47-55
  • 8[10]Gehring W J et al. Probability Effects on Stimulus evaluation and Response Processes. Joumal of Experimental Psychology: Hman Perception and Performance, 1992, 18(1):198-216

共引文献1

同被引文献28

  • 1陈永明,崔耀.汉语歧义句的加工[J].心理学报,1997,29(1):2-8. 被引量:23
  • 2吴彦文,游旭群,霍涌泉.主题信息合理性、语境意义偏向性对汉语歧义句意义建构的影响[J].心理科学,2004,27(4):855-858. 被引量:4
  • 3宋晓蕾,游旭群.Simon效应及其反转现象作用机制的研究[J].心理科学,2006,29(2):305-307. 被引量:3
  • 4Zhang H Z,Zhang J,Kornblum S. A parallel distributed processing model of stimulus-response compatibility. Cognitive Psychology, 1999,38(3) :386~432
  • 5Kornblum S. The way irrelevant dimensions are processed depends on what they overlap with: the case of stroop and simon-like stimuli. Psychological Research,1994,56(2) :130~135
  • 6Kornblum S, Hasbroucq T, Osman A.Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility - a model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 1990,97(2) :253~270
  • 7Smeets P M, Holmes D B,Roche B. Derived stimulus-response and stimulusstimulus relations in children and adults:assessing training order effects.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,2001,78(2) :130~154
  • 8Dassonville P, Lewis S M, Foster H E, et al. Choice and stimulus-response compatibility affect duration of response selection. Cognitive Brain Research, 1999, 7(3) :235~240
  • 9McDonald R J,King A L, Hong N S.Context-specific interference on reversal learning of a stimulus- response habit. Behavioural Brain Research,2001,121 (2) : 149~165
  • 10Hommel B. Stumulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect:toward an empirical clarification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1995,21 (4) :764 -775

引证文献4

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部