期刊文献+

异常反应模式的识别和分类 被引量:9

DETECTION AND CLASSIFICATION OF ABERRANT ITEM RESPONSE PATTERNSUSING PERSON FIT INDEX AND MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过对Drasgow等人的个人适合指标lz 公式的再分解 ,发现该指标也属于残差型类的指标。特别是和Tat suoka的广义个人适合指标 ζ指标具有类似的数学结构 ,除符号相反外 ,不同之处仅是公式中加权项。其次 ,该研究定义了任意两个异常反应对象的类似度 ,在此基础上试用多维标度法对异常反应模式进行再分类。结果说明分类是有效、实用的。 There were two main features of this paper: 1) the likelihood based p e rson fit index l z and the residual based caution index, Tatsuoka's ζ ha ve similar mathematical structure except the difference of weight. The wei ght of l z index is a logit of an item response function (IRF), while the weigh t of ζ is residual IRF and true score; 2) a degree of coincidence between any t wo aberrant subjects is defined as a similarity for multidimensional scaling (MD S):S j?k=∑gr=1p j?rp k?r+(1 p j?r)(1 p k?r) 1/2, where g is the number of item groups, p j?r is the proportion of subject j who answer correctl y in the item group r. The larger value of the S j?k, the more similar ity will be between the subject j and k. A dataset of Chinese vocabulary test wa s investigated using the l z index and MDS. The 3.5% of the abe rrant subjects were detected, and classified into 5 types. The result of MDS indicated that it is a useful and effective method for classification of aberra nt item response patterns. Suggestions for future research are provided.
作者 曹亦薇
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2001年第6期558-563,共6页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
关键词 项目反应理论 个人适合指标 类似度 多维标度法 IRT, person fit index, similarity, multidimensional scaling.
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Zickar M J, Drasgow F. Detecting faking on a personality instrument using Appropriateness measurement. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1996, 20:71-87
  • 2Schmitt N, Chan D, Sacco J, McFarland L A, Danielle J. Correlates of Person Fit and effect of Person fit on test validity. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1999, 23:41-53
  • 3Reise S P. A Comparison of item-and person-fit methods of assessing model-Date fit in IRT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1990, 14:127-137
  • 4Runder L M, Bracey G, Skaggs G. The use of a person-fit statistic with one High-quality achievement test. Applied measurement in education, 1996, 9:91-109
  • 5Levine M V, Rubin D. Measuring the appropriateness of multiple-choice test scores. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1979, 4:269-290
  • 6Drasgow F, Levine M, Williams E A. Appropriateness measurement with Polychotomous item response models and standardized indices. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1985,38:67-86
  • 7Wright B D, Stone M H. Best test design, Rasch measurement. Chicago: Mesa Press, 1979
  • 8Tatsuoka K K. Caution indices based on item response theory. Psychometrika, 1984,49:95-110
  • 9Tatsuoka K K. Use of generalized person-fit indexes, zetas for statistical Pattern classification. Applied measurement in education, 1996, 9:65-75
  • 10Nering M L. A Comparison of the person response function and lz person-fit statistic. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1998, 22:53-69

二级参考文献2

  • 1曹亦薇,心理科学,1998年,21卷,4期,375页
  • 2曹亦薇,教育心理学研究(日),1993年,41卷,64页

共引文献7

同被引文献142

引证文献9

二级引证文献63

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部