“全球化”语境中的中国文学问题

Chinese Literature in “Globalizational”Context

中国文学走向世界,必须从既往的历史积淀中反求诸己.过去我们没有把全世界读者看作是"服务对象".对外国平民百姓来说,并不都是因为意识形态不同而拒斥中国文学,主要还在于我们的作品所描写的内容和题材,是否具有更广泛的全人类性,是否能让他们通过观赏文艺达到一种相互了解和心灵沟通.当前文学失序的状态和创作群体的多极化、多元化,是这种大视野的"全民文艺"观的明证.也是文学大获发展的一个非常好的契机.文学批评的政治标准可以简化为一种法律,如作家所写的题材和内容不违法,艺术性就上升到衡量该作品标准的第一位了.我们要求文艺作品的最高境界,是思想与艺术、内容与形式的完美结合.当这种最高标准难以达到时,一种急功近利的捷径,常常代替艺术创造的艰苦努力.今天有些作品"思想大于形象",主题设置模式化、概念化,迷信"题材决定"论,重思想型写作而轻艺术型写作,都可能与受"政治标准第一"的曲解和误导有关.

Chinese literature moves towards the world,and it should demand itself adversely from the historical deposition.In the past,we did not take the readers of the whole world as the “target of service”.For the rank and file abroad,they refuse Chinese literature not because of ideology different from theirs,mainly our literary works have or don't have the broad nature of all humanity,or let them get to know each other and share each other's mind by means of reading,viewing and admiring the works of literature and art.At present,the disordered literary state,multipolirzation and pluralization of the groups of creation are the clear proof of this grand visual field of the view point of “literature and art of the entire people”,it is the very good juncture of great development of literature as well.The political criterion of literary criticism may be simplified into a kind of the law ,for nstance,if the material and contents the writers describe are not illegal artistry will be raised to the first place of the criterion to measure those works.We demand that the highest state of the works of literature and art is perfect integration of thought and art,contents and forms.When this highest state is hard to reach,a shortcut to seek success and instant benefits may be substituted for the hard work of artistic creation.Nowadays,in some works“thinking is bigger than the images”,the themes are projected in models and abstract terms,there exists a cult of “the theory of material-decision”,it highly values the writing of thinking type and make light of the writing of artistic type,all of those concern the misunderstanding and misleading of “political criterion first”.