智能电针与智能电针加经络氧对焦虑症的疗效及相关因素探讨

A clinical comparison of computer controlled electro-acupuncture and computer controlled electro-acupuncture plus meridian oxygen in the treatment of anxiety

目的 :探讨智能电针与智能电针加经络氧治疗焦虑症的疗效及相关因素的影响。 方法 :对照两种疗法对焦虑症的疗效及相关因素分析。 结果 :治疗焦虑症的显效率智能电针组为 60 0 % ,智能电针加经络氧组为 77.5 % ,且智能电针加经络氧组痊愈率为 5 5 .0 % ,显著高于智能电针组的 3 1 4% (P <0 .0 5 ) :两组的疗效均与治疗次数正相关 ,与本次病程负相关。 结论 :智能电针及智能电针加经络氧治疗焦虑症均有较好疗效 。

Obective:In order to investigate the effects of computer controlled electro-acupuncture plus meridian oxygen. Methods: The effects and relative factors of two therapies in the treatment of anxiety in the last decade were compared and analyzed. Results: Marked effect rates of computer controlled electro-acupuncture group and computer controlled electro-acupuncture plus meridian oxygen group were 60.0% and 77.5% which was markedly higher than that of computer controlled electro-acupuncture group, and the healing rates of two groups were respectively 31.4% and 55.0% ( P <0.05). The curative effects of two groups were positive correlation with time of treatment and negative correlation with course of disease. Conclusions: It is suggested that computer controlled electro-acupuncture and computer controlled electro-acupuncture plus meridian oxygen all had good effects in the treatment of anxiety, and computer controlled electro-acupuncture plus meridian oxygen had higher recovery rate in the treatment of anxiety.