《合同法》中不安抗辩权与预期违约制度刍议

On Unsafe Right of Pleadings and Anticipatory Breach of Contract in Law of Contract

不安抗辩权与预期违约制度分别是大陆法系与英美法系中的传统制度,我国<合同法>经过借鉴和吸收,在其第68、69条和第94、108条分别规定了我国的不安抗辩权和预期违约制度.这填补了原立法上的空白,固然是一大进步,但不分清优劣利弊,简单地把两种制度揉和在一起,在适用过程中难免会产生许多问题,并会导致这两种制度的传统优势难以发挥.

The unsafe right of pleadings and the anticipatory breach of contract are the traditional institutions belonging to Anglo-American law system. By borrowing and absorbing them, the Law of Contract in our country stipulates the unsafe right of pleadings and the anticipatory breach of contract system in NO.68, NO.69, NO.94 and NO.108 articles. The legislation makes great progress and it fills in the blank of old laws. But we often do not distinguish the benefits and the drawbacks of these two institutions, and only put them together simply, which leads to many problems in the course of application. And the traditional superiorities of these two institutions can hardly be acquired.