试议我国民事诉讼目的

Study on the Purpose of the Civil Action in Our Country

关于民事诉讼目的的诸多观点,如"权利保护说"、"私法秩序维持说"、"纠纷解决说"等等均有其不合理性。我国学界的主流观点即"民事诉讼多元目的说"事实上是无目的,不能作为我国民事诉讼的目的。而"利益保障说"的观点比较符合我国目前的需要,强调既要保障当事人的程序利益,又要维护当事人实体利益,对构建符合我国特色的诉讼程序模式提供了理论指导。

Many standpoints on the purpose of civil action are not reasonable, such as 'right protecting','the private laws order maintaining','conflicts solving',etc. The mainstream standpoint of 'the multi-purpose of civil action' in fact is to have no purpose, which can't be the purpose of the civil action in our country. But the standpoint of 'ensuring the benefits' relatively meets the current demands in our country, which emphasizes ensuring the procedure benefits of the party concerned, as well as ensuring their entitative benefits, and it will provide the theoretical guidance for setting up the litigation procedure mode which match the special features of our country.