摘要
目的 探讨丙泊酚靶控输注和异氟醚吸入对罗库溴铵药效学的影响。方法 选择无神经肌肉疾患 ,在全麻下择期手术的病人 4 8例 ,随机分成丙泊酚靶控输注组 (B组 )和异氟醚吸入组(Y组 )维持麻醉。采用TOF刺激方式监测拇内收肌的收缩反应。当T1恢复至对照值的 2 0 %时追加罗库溴铵 0 15mg/kg。记录每次追加罗库溴铵的间隔时间以及肌松恢复情况。 结果 两组肌松维持时间无明显差异 (P >0 0 5 ) ,而B组罗库溴铵总用药量明显高于Y组 (P <0 0 5 )。B组各次追加罗库溴铵间隔时间平均为 (2 6 1± 9 3)s,Y组平均间隔时间为 (36 2± 13 2 )s,明显比B组长 (P<0 0 5 )。Y组第 1、2次给药后的间隔时间相似 (P >0 0 5 ) ,第 3、4、5次给药后间隔时间也相似 (P <0 0 5 ) ,但是比第 1、2次延长 (P <0 0 5 )。Y组T1恢复到对照值的 2 5 %、5 0 %和 75 %的时间及拔管时间比B组长 (P <0 0 5 ) ,但两组的恢复指数相似 (P >0 0 5 )。结论 丙泊酚靶控输注对罗库溴铵的药效学没有影响。而异氟醚对罗库溴铵则起增效作用 ,异氟醚维持麻醉时应酌情减少罗库溴铵的用量。
Objective To study the effects of propofol TCI or isoflurane inhalation on rocuronium pharmacodynamincs.Methods Forty-eight patients without neuromuscular disease undergoing selective operation were randomly divided into propofol target control infusion(TCI)group(group B)and isoflurane inhalation group(group Y).Thumb adductorius contractile response was monitored with TOF stimulation.When T 1 recovering 20% of control value,rocuronium 0.15 mg/kg was intravenously injected.The interval of rocuronium injection and the recovery of muscle relaxation were recorded.Results There was no significant difference between two groups in the duration of muscle relaxation (P>0.05),but total amount of rocuronium in group B was higher than that of group Y(P<0.05).The interval of rocuronium injection in group B averaged (26.1±9.3) s,which was significantly shorter than that in group Y(36.2±13.2) s(P<0.05).In group Y,the first and second intervals of rocuronium injection were similar(P>0.05),the third,fourth and fifth intervals of that were also similar(P>0.05),but longer than those of the first and second interval(P<0.05).The time of T 1 recovering 20%,50% and 75% of the control value and extubation time were longer in group Y than those in group B(P<0.05),but the recovery index between the two groups was not significantly different(P>0.05).Conclusion Propofol TCI has no effects on rocuronium pharmacodynamics.Isofluran inhalation augments the effect of rocuronium and the dose of rocuronium should be decreased during isofluran anesthesia.
出处
《临床麻醉学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
2003年第12期728-730,共3页
Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology