医疗诉讼中举证责任倒置引发问题的探讨

A Discussion on Inversive Responsibility to Give Evidence for Medical Tangles in Medical Lawsuits

以最高人民法院关于医疗诉讼中实行举证责任倒置的司法解释出台为背景,分析了该司法解释在实践中的反应与理论上争议,比较系统地对国外医疗事故立法进行了归纳,并根据医疗合同的性质提出了新的观点,即医疗合同应该分成三个阶段门诊诊断治疗合同、急诊诊断治疗合同、入院诊断治疗合同。还据此对政府、社会、医疗行为提供者提出了一些切实可行的建议。

Beased on the judicial explanation of the inversive responsibility to give evidence in medical lawsuits by the Supreme People′s Court,the author analyses its practical reflections and theoretical disputes,systematically summarizes the legislations on medical accidents abroad,and gives new suggestions according to the nature of medical contracts.That is three steps should be covered in medical contracts:the contracts of clinic diagnose and treatment,the contracts of emergency diagnose and treatment and the contracts of hospitalization diagnose and treatment.The author also gives some practical suggestions to the government,society and meical service providers.