民事证据发现制度比较研究

A Comparative Study on Discovery System of Civil Evidence

英美法系国家的民事证据发现制度虽然在证据发现的范围、发现方法以及违反发现程序规定的制裁措施 ,即基本构造上与大陆法系国家的有关规定不同 ,似乎显得更为详尽、周全。然而英美法系国家在有关证据发现的规定上之所以颇具匠心 ,并非完全是因为立法技术上的成熟 ,其实是其诉讼体制的实际需要。诉讼体制不同 ,其制度设置也必然各异。为此 ,中国民事证据制度的构建 ,应当从中国诉讼体制的特点出发进行设置。

The discovery system of civil evidence of common law national is different from that of civil law national in respect of the basic constitution of the discovery,namely,the scope,methods of the discovery and the measures of sanction resulting from the violation of the discovery .The former seems to be more thorough and completion.However, the reason that the rules of the discovery of the common are contrived peculiarly is more the realistic need of the litigation system than the mature of the legislation technology.That is to say,the setup of the institution of the discovery is necessarily various if the litigation system is different.Thus,the construction of the civil evidence system of China should be set up in light of the character of the litigation system of China.