《合同法》表见代理之评判

Judging the Appearance Agent of Contract Law

我国《合同法》规定的表见代理从合同法的立法目的、意思自治原则、诚实信用原则方面看均存在缺陷。表见代理可以适用于法定代理情形,这是由表见代理设立的基础和目的所决定。当然代理责任的承担应该有异于意定代理,这时可以借鉴交通事故处理中的责任垫付制度,即最终责任由有过错的代理人承担,在代理人不能承担或部分不能承担责任时,如果被代理人有财产可由其垫付,被代理人在垫付后可以向代理人追偿。

The paper mainly judges the inadequate appearance agent system from the legislationaim,the idea self-control rule and the honest credit rule.The situation that the appearance agent can adapt to the legal agent depends on the basis and aim stipulated by the appearance agent.Of course the bearing of the agent liability should be different from that of the agent by agreement,which can use the experience of the liability paying system dealing with the traffic accident,namely the final liability is borne by the faulty agent,when the agent can't bear all or part liability,if the person who gives the agent right has property to pay,then he can recover the payment of the agent.