期刊文献+

儿童的直接推理能力及策略的发展 被引量:7

DEVELOPMENT OF THE DIRECT INFERENCE ABILITY AND STRATEGIES OF CHILDREN
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用文字形式陈述前提 ,让儿童根据前提内容回答问题 ,以了解儿童在语言条件下的直接推理能力。并通过事后追问儿童作答的原因 ,对儿童推理的策略进行分析。结果表明 :(1) 6岁和 7岁儿童初步发展了语言条件下的直接推理能力 ,8岁儿童形成了这种能力。从 6岁到 8岁 ,儿童的这种推理能力随年龄增长而迅速提高。 (2 )否定前提和肯定前提没有给儿童的直接推理造成影响。而且 ,反义词的转换 ,也没有增加任务的推理难度。 (3)从6岁到 8岁儿童的有效生成能力和使用能力都在明显提高。 6岁、7岁儿童在直接推理时有效策略和无效策略并存 ,但几乎所有的 8岁儿童都使用了“重复或解释前提”这一有效策略。 The purpose of the study was to investigate the development of children in direct inference and analyze the strategies children used during reasoning. The participants were 72 children randomly selected from a kindergarten and an elementary school including three groups aged 6, 7 and 8 with half boys and half girls in each group. The tests were carried out individually. The results showed that: (1) The 6- and 7-year-olds had preliminarily (developed) this kind of direct inference ability, the 8-year-olds had possessed this kind of inference ability. (2) There was no significant difference between affirmative premise and negative premise, and the same result was obtained when the semantic reverse between the premise and problem. (3) The capacity of creating effective strategy increased with ages, and nearly all 8-year-olds can use the effective strategy of ”repeat or explain premise”.
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2004年第5期558-562,共5页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
基金 教育部人文社科研究基地重大项目 ( 2 0 0 0ZBXMXLX0 0 2 )的资助
关键词 儿童 直接推理 肯定前提 否定前提 策略 children, direct inference, affirmative premise, negative premise, strategy.
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1[1]Piaget J, Inhelder B, Szeminska A. The child's conception of geometry. London, Routledge, 1960
  • 2[2]Bryant P E, Trabasso T. Transitive inference and memory in young children. Nature, 1971, 232: 456~458
  • 3[3]Halford G S, Galloway W. Children who fail to make transitive inferences can rember comparisons. Australian Journal of Psychology, 1977, 29: 1~5
  • 4[4]Russell J. Children's memory for the premises in a transitive measurement task assessed by elicited and spontaneous justifications. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1981, 31: 300~309
  • 5[5]Brainerd C, Kingma J. Do children have to remember to reason? A fuzzy-trace theory of transitivity development. Developmental Review, 1984, 4: 311~377
  • 6[12]Liu I M. Sentence comprehension in Chinese and English. In: H S R Kao, R Hoosain ed. Psychological Studies of the Chinese Language. The Chinese Language Society of Hong Kong, 1984. 181~217

同被引文献86

引证文献7

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部