期刊文献+

不同采样密度下土壤特性的空间变异特征及其推估精度研究 被引量:29

SPATIAL VARIABILITY OF SOIL PROPERTIES AT DIFFERENT SAMPLING INTENSITIES AND ACCURACY OF THEIR ESTIMATION
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对3种采样密度下的土壤特性进行了空间变异结构研究,并在此基础上对土壤特性的推估精度进行了比较。土壤空间变异结构在不同采样密度下的变化随土壤的特性而定,土壤pH、NH4+-N、P及S的变异分别符合不同的半方差模型,土壤OM、Ca及Mg则均符合同一模型;采样密度与模型的拟合度、变异的有效变程及空间相关性均没有必然联系。对模型拟合度均达显著水平的土壤特性进行推估,土壤OM及S的推估精度随采样密度的提高而增加,但土壤NH4+-N及Ca没有表现出同样的规律。 s Spatial variability of soil properties was studied, and comparison in estimation accuracy was conducted between three different sampling intensities. The structure of soil spatial variation change with sampling intensities and soil properties. Variation of soil pH, NH4+-N, P and S was best fitted with their corresponding semi-variation model, respectively, whereas that of soil OM, Ca and Mg could be simulated by the same one model. Sampling intensities did not have anything certain with the fitting degree of models, effective range and spatial dependence of variation. Soil properties with significant model-fitting degree were estimated, with results showing that the accuracy of estimation with soil OM and S increased with sampling intensity, however, it was not the case with soil NH4+-N and Ca.
出处 《土壤》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2004年第5期538-542,共5页 Soils
基金 中-加合作研究项目及广东省国际合作项目(2002C50403)资助。
关键词 土壤特性 采样密度 空间变异 推估精度 Soil property, Sampling intensity, Spatial variability, Estimation accuracy
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Yost RS, Uehara G, Fox RL. Geostatistical analysis of soil chemical properties of large land areas. I. Semi- variogram.Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 1982, 46:1028 ~ 1032
  • 2Itaru Okuda, Masanori Okazaki, Takusei Hashitani. Spatial and temporal variations in the chemical weathering of basaltic pyroclastic materials. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 1995,59:887 ~ 894
  • 3Timlin DJ, Pachepsky Y, Snyder VA, Bryant RB. Spatial and temporal variability of corn grain yield on a hillslope.Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 1998, 62 (3): 764 ~ 773
  • 4Bahman Eghball, James S. Schepers. Spatial and temporal variability of soil nitrate and corn yield. Agronomy Journal,2003, 95 (2): 339 ~ 346
  • 5van Groenigen JW. The inference of variogram parameters on optimal sampling schemes for mapping by kriging.Geoderma, 2000, 97:223 ~ 236
  • 6Juang KW, Liou DY, Lee DY. Site-specific phosphorus application based on the Kriging fertilizer-phosphorus availability index of soils. J. Environ. Qual., 2002, 31:1248~ 1255
  • 7Gert Verstraeten, Jean Poesen. Regional scale variability in sediment and nutrient delivery from small agricultural watersheds. J. Environ. Qual., 2002, 31:870 ~ 879
  • 8Kui-wei Juang, Dar-yuan Li. Comparison of three nonparametric Kriging methods for delineating heavymetal contaminated soils. J. Environ. Qual., 2000, 29 (1): 197~ 205
  • 9Wilson JP, Spangrud DJ, Nielsen G, Jacobsen JS, Tyler DA.Global positioning system sampling intensity and pattern effects on computed topographic attributes. Soil Sci. Soc.Am. J., 1998, 62 (5): 1410 ~ 1417
  • 10Mueller TG, Pierce FJ. Soil carbon maps: Enhancing spatial estimates with simple terrain attributes at multiple scales.Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 2003, 67 (1): 258 ~ 267

二级参考文献6

共引文献174

同被引文献368

引证文献29

二级引证文献360

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部