期刊文献+

口腔内金属修复物的成分分析 被引量:6

Metal elements from intraoral metal restorations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:测定口腔内金属修复物的成分,确定使用的合金种类,以使牙科金属过敏患者避免再次使用此种合金。方法:用细砂纸及圆锥形抛光磨头,采取微量口腔内金属修复物,通过EDXRF(荧光X线分析仪)测定所含金属成分,确定合金种类。结果:14例可疑牙科金属过敏患者中,牙科金属修复物120个,按照检出频度的高低,排在前10位的金属元素分别是Ag、Cu、Au、Pd、Zn、Sn、Co、Cr、In和Mo。Au-Ag-Pd合金的使用频度为65%,Ag-Sn-Hg合金为2.5%,Ag合金为5.4%,Au合金为14.6%,Ni-Cr、Co-Cr合金为10.1%,其他2.4%。2种以上异种合金共存同一口腔环境中的患者12例,5种合金同时存在者1例。含Hg的银汞合金的使用频度为2.5%,与10年前的使用频度16%相比下降明显。Ni、Cr、Co的使用频度未见明显改变。结论:被疑牙科金属过敏的患者中,异种金属同存的现象严重,提示在口腔科临床工作中,尽量避免使用异种金属及含Hg和Ni等易诱发过敏的金属合金。 PURPOSE: To detect the metal element from intraoral metal restorations. METHODS: A small sample was taken from each intraoral metal restorations. Energy-dispersive X ray fluorescence spectrometry (EDXRF) was used to detect the metal elements from them. RESULTS: From 14 suspected patients of dental metal allergy, 120 intraoral metal restorations were detected. The ten most frequent elements detected ,in decreasing order of frequency, were Ag, Cu, Au, Pd, Zn, Sn, Co,Cr,In and Mo. The types and percentages of alloys containing these elements were Au-Ag-Pd alloys(65%),Ag-Sn-Hg amalgams(2.5%),Ag alloys(5.4%),Au alloys (14.6%),Ni-Cr alloys and Co-Cr alloys(10.1%),other alloys (2.4%). In these,Ag-Sn-Hg amalgams (2.5%)are in lower using rate than 10 years before(16%). Ni,Co,Cr alloys are in same using rate as 10 years before. There are 12 patients with two to five kinds of different alloys present at an oral environment. In one of 12 patients,five kinds of different alloys were present within an oral environment. CONCLUSIONS: In patients suspicious of dental metal allergy, co-existence of different metals alloys was often detected, which indicated that in order to prevent dental metal allergy, heterogeneous metal and metal alloys containing Hg and Ni should be avoided as much as possible.
出处 《上海口腔医学》 CAS CSCD 2004年第3期189-192,共4页 Shanghai Journal of Stomatology
关键词 金属修复物 牙科金属过敏 荧光X线分析仪 Metal restoration Dental metal allergy EDXRF
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Coombs RRA, Gell PGH. Classification of allergic reactions responsible for clinical hypersensitivity and disease. In: Gell PGH,Coombs RRA , Lachmanu PJ (Editors). Clinical aspects of immunology[M]. 3rd ed, Oxford: Blackweill Scientific Publications,1975:7
  • 2Liden C, Wahlberg JE . Cross-reactivity to metal compounds stud.ied in guinea pigs induced with chromate or cobalt. Acta Derm Venereol[J]. 1994,74:341-343.
  • 3Angle CR. Organ-specific therapeutic intervention . In: Goyer RA, Klaasen CD. Waalkes MP, editors. Metal toxicology [M]. San Diego:Academic Press, 1995:71-110.
  • 4Fujii H, Nakamura S, Koike M, et al. The present state of metal allergy and its countermeasure in dental practice [J]. In: Dental Clinic and Allergy Special Issue. Nippon Dent Rev, 2000,689:63-73.
  • 5Nakamura M, Ooshima H. The present situation of allergy in the dental clinics. In: Dental Clinic and Allergy Special Issue [J].Nippon Dent Rev,2000,689:58-62.
  • 6Yang J, Merritt K. Production of monoclonal antibodies to study corrosion of Co-Cr biomaterials[J]. J Biomed Mater Res, 1996,31:71-80.
  • 7Haudrechy P, Foussereau J, Mantout B, et al. Nickel release from nickel-plated metals and stainless steels [J]. Contact Dermatitis,1994,31:249-255.
  • 8Kanerva L, Sipilainen-Malm T, Estlander T, et al. Nickel release from metals, and a case of allergic contact dermatitis from stainless steel[J], Contact Dermatitis, 1994,31:299-303.
  • 9Lalor PA, Revell PA , Gray AB, et al. Sensitivity to titanium: A cause ofImplant failure[J] J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1991,73:25-28.
  • 10Parker AW, Drez D Jr, Jacobs JJ, Titanium dermatitis after failure of a metal-backed patellas[J].Am J Knee Surg, 1993,6:129-131.

同被引文献102

引证文献6

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部