摘要
合同法第122条赋予了受损害方要求违约方承担违约责任或侵权责任的“择一请求”权,是我国民事立法的重大突破。但是,当两个请求权所指向的利益可以独立并存时,该法条规制乏力,有明显缺陷,应予以修补。应当既承认受损害方的诉讼选择权,又同时维护其两方面的实体利益。
Article 122 in contract law entrtles the victim the right of alternative plea--the responsibility for breaking a contract or to infringement taken by the injuring party.This is a great breakthrough of our country's civil legislation.Whereas,when the two rights point to interest which are exist separately for each other,the article 122 cannot work well, and needs amendment due to its flaws.We should recognize the right of choice for victim to sue,and protect the interest of victim in both aspects.
出处
《行政与法》
2004年第9期105-107,共3页
Administration and Law
关键词
请求权
择一请求
法律漏洞
pleading rights
alternative plea
legal defects