期刊文献+

《中华人民共和国合同法》第122条的缺陷评析及补救 被引量:1

A Way Out The Ambiguousness Of Alternative Breachment Compensating Responsibility
下载PDF
导出
摘要 合同法第122条赋予了受损害方要求违约方承担违约责任或侵权责任的“择一请求”权,是我国民事立法的重大突破。但是,当两个请求权所指向的利益可以独立并存时,该法条规制乏力,有明显缺陷,应予以修补。应当既承认受损害方的诉讼选择权,又同时维护其两方面的实体利益。 Article 122 in contract law entrtles the victim the right of alternative plea--the responsibility for breaking a contract or to infringement taken by the injuring party.This is a great breakthrough of our country's civil legislation.Whereas,when the two rights point to interest which are exist separately for each other,the article 122 cannot work well, and needs amendment due to its flaws.We should recognize the right of choice for victim to sue,and protect the interest of victim in both aspects.
机构地区 培正商学院
出处 《行政与法》 2004年第9期105-107,共3页 Administration and Law
关键词 请求权 择一请求 法律漏洞 pleading rights alternative plea legal defects
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献40

  • 1Note, "Exemplary Damages in the Law of Torts", 70 Harv. L. Rev. 517, 517 (1957), and Huckle v.Money, 95 Eng. Rep. 768 (K. B. 1763).
  • 2Malzof V. United Statea, I 12 S. Ct. 711, 715 (1992).
  • 3Ernet C. Stiefel: "U. S. Punitive Damage Awards in Germany" , 39 The American Journal of Comparative Law, 1991, p. 784.
  • 4TimothyJ. Phillips ,"The Punitive Dawage Class Action: A Solution to the problem of Multiple punishment" ,1984 U. Ill. L. Rev. 153.
  • 5David R. Levy, Note, "Punitive Damages in Light of TXO Productions Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp",39 St. Louis U, L. J. 409, 412 n. 20 (1994).
  • 6Ausness, Retribution and Deterrence : The Role of Punitive Damages in Products Liability Litation , 74 K y.L. J. 1,2 (1985).
  • 7Coryell v. Colbaugh, 1 N. J. L. 90, 91 (Sup. Ct. 1791).
  • 8Wils. K. B. 20.5, 9.5 Eng, Rep. 768 (C. P. 1763).
  • 9Genayv. Norris, IS. C. L. 3, 1 Bay 6 (1784).
  • 10David Owen, "Punative Damage in Products Liability Litigation", 74 Mich. L. Rev. 1257 (1976).

共引文献851

同被引文献1

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部