期刊文献+

批评性语篇分析:问题与讨论 被引量:49

Critical Discourse Analysis: Criticism and Discussion
原文传递
导出
摘要 作为一种话语分析方法,出现于20世纪80年代初的批评性语篇分析难免存在这样或那样的局限性,这从一开始就引起了人们的注意。近几年对这种方法的批评在不断增加,其中大部分批评恰如其分,很有见地,值得CDA学者认真思考,但也有一些批评似乎有失公允,反映了批评者对CDA的期望值太高。本文以斯塔布斯和威窦森为代表简单评述了人们对CDA提出的一些主要批评。 As an approach to text/discourse analysis, critical discourse analysis (CDA) has been under constant criticism since its emergence in the 1980s. Many of the criticisms are apt and illuminating, but some others are not so fair, showing that the critics might have expected too much from CDA.
作者 辛斌
出处 《外国语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第5期64-69,共6页 Journal of Foreign Languages
关键词 话语分析方法 批评性语篇分析 斯塔布斯 语言学 critical discourse analysis criticisms discussion
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Carter, R. Language and Literature: An Introduction Reader in Stylistics [C]. London:George Allen & Unwin, 1982.
  • 2Culler, J. On Deconstruction: Theory and Criticism after Structuralism [M]. Ithaca, 1982.
  • 3Fairclough, N. Language and Power [M].London/New York: Longman, 1989.
  • 4Fairclough, N. Discourse and Social Change [M]. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992.
  • 5Fairclough, N. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language [M]. London/New York: Longman, 1995.
  • 6Fowler, R. Linguistic Criticism [M]. Oxford/New York: OUP, 1986.
  • 7Fowler, R. Critical Linguistics [A]. Malmkjaer, K (ed.) The Linguistics Encyclopedia [C]. London: Routledge, 1991.
  • 8Fowler, R. On Critical Linguistics [A]. R Caldas-Coulthard & M Coulthard. Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis [C]. London: Routledge, 1996.
  • 9Frow, J. Marxism and Literary History [M]. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1986.
  • 10Lyons, J. Language and Linguistics [M].Cambridge: CUE 1981.

共引文献10

同被引文献674

引证文献49

二级引证文献497

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部