摘要
米尔恩人权哲学通过对先验人权观的批判,以低度道德作为其权利体系的理论起点,这有利于消除人权国际保护中的政治化趋向;低限人权概念是米尔恩人权哲学体系的理论内核,它在人权国际立法中具有可操作性,使人权国际保护从理论必然性走向了现实可能性;普遍人权命题是米尔恩人权哲学体系的理论诉求,普遍人权命题意味着人权主体的普遍性和人权标准的普遍性,并调和了不同人权价值的对立,从而为人权国际保护的对话提供了理论平台。
Through the criticism of prior human rights protection,Milne takes the low-quality ethics as his theoretical debut,which facilitate the elimination of politics in the international protection of human rights.Low-limit human rights is the inner theoretical core of human rights philosophy of Milne,which can be operated in the international laws and which makes the international protection of human rights from theoretical necessity to practical probability.Universal human rights is the theoretical pursuit of the human rights philosophy of Milne,which include the universality of the human rights as an entity and its standard and which reconciles the conflicts of the different values of human rights and which also provide the theoretical platform for the dialogue of the international protection of human rights.
出处
《桂海论丛》
2004年第5期62-65,共4页
Guihai Tribune
关键词
人权哲学
国际保护
低度道德
低限人叔
普遍人权
the human rights philosophy
international protection
the low-quality ethics
low-limit human rights
universal human rights