期刊文献+

侦查讯问中犯罪嫌疑人陈述自愿的制度保障 被引量:2

Talking about the system guarantee of the suspect voluntary state in investigation and interrogation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 犯罪嫌疑人陈述自愿的保障,是正当讯问制度的核心内容。目前侦查讯问与犯罪嫌疑人陈述自愿存在种种现实冲突,应通过赋予犯罪嫌疑人沉默权,律师在权。限制讯问结果的运用,录音、录像监控,增强相应机关的独立性,以及完善坦白从宽抗拒从严政策等,解决犯罪嫌疑人陈述自愿的制度保障问题。 The author was talking about the declarative value of the suspect in investigation and interrogation, and setting forth the realistic conflict between the investigation and interrogation and the suspect voluntary state. At last, the author was putting forward the measures of the system guarantee for suspect voluntary state in investigation and interrogation.
作者 吕红
机构地区 湖北警官学院
出处 《四川警官高等专科学校学报》 2004年第5期48-51,共4页
关键词 侦查讯问制度 犯罪嫌疑人 陈述自愿制度 沉默权 刑事诉讼 侦讯人员 Investigation and Interrogation State of the Suspect Voluntary State System Guarantee
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献13

  • 1[3]英国刑事诉讼法(选编)[Z].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2001.50.
  • 2[4]Andrew Sanders & Richard Young,Criminal Justice,Butterworths(1994),P148.
  • 3[6]Culombe v.Connecticut,367 U.S.568,81 S.Ct.1860,6 L.Ed.2d 1037(1961).
  • 4[8]Andrew Sanders & Richard Young, Criminal Justice, Butterworths (1994), P148.
  • 5[11]Preface to Vincent's Police Code (1882). Reproduced in Royal Commission on Criminal Procedure, The Investigation and Prosecution of Criminal Offences in England and Wales: The Law and Procedure (Cmnd 8092 - 1), 1981, p162 - 163.
  • 6[12]Esmain, Droit constitutional, sixth edition, published by M. Joseph berthelemy, 1914, p29-30.
  • 7[15]Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S. Ct. 1602, 16 L. Ed.2d 694 (1966).
  • 8[17]Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S. Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966).
  • 9[18]Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S. Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694(1966).
  • 10[19]Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S. Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694(1966).

共引文献62

同被引文献9

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部