摘要
《中图法》“K2中国史”中,规定可以仿K20分的类目中存在着许多与K20相重复的类目;“K27中华人民共和国时期”类目应该设立下位类,却没有设立下位类目;“K2127中国各代史”仿K20分统一规定加“0”的做法既无必要,又造成加“0”问题上的混乱。
At the class of ″K2 Chinese History″ in Chinese Library Classificati on Scheme it stipulates that in the subordinate class, we can imitate K20 to cre ate a lot of classes like those repeated in K20; while in the class of ″K27 Peo ple's Republic of China Times″ should have a subordinate class, but unfortunat ely there is no such a subordinate class. In ″K21/27 the History of Each Dynast y″; the addition of ″0 ″ to K20 is not necessary, because it can create a lo t of confusions.
出处
《农业图书情报学刊》
2004年第11期216-218,共3页
Journal of Library and Information Sciences in Agriculture
关键词
《中图法》
K2中国史
问题探讨
Chinese Library Classification scheme
K2 Chinese History
probe into problems