期刊文献+

电子商务智能Agent的自适应模糊推理 被引量:1

Adaptive fuzzy reasoning approach for e-commerce intelligent Agents
下载PDF
导出
摘要 电子市场中的买卖双方达成交易的过程可以看作是一个连续双向拍卖(CDA)协议。面向电子商务实际应用,给出了CDA协议下买卖双方参与竟标的模糊规则及模糊推理方法。在推理过程中,交易Agent可以根据市场需求状况和自身特性对模糊规则的某些参数进行合理优化,从而自动适应市场变化。 In electronic marketplaces,the buyer and seller can be seen as agents who participating continuous double auctions(CDA). For practical applications,an adaptive fuzzy reasoning approach was given that buyer and seller agents can use to participate CDA.E-commerce Agents can also effectively change some parameters of the fuzzy rules according to present market situations and its characters.
出处 《计算机应用》 CSCD 北大核心 2004年第11期38-40,共3页 journal of Computer Applications
基金 国家 86 3计划项目 (2 0 0 2AA1 3 40 2 0 -0 4)
关键词 智能AGENT 电子市场 连续双向拍卖 模糊集 intelligent Agent electronic marketplaces CDA fuzzy sets
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1[1]WOOLDRIDGE M,JENNINGS NR.Intelligent Agents:Theory and Practice[ J].The Knowledge Engineering Review,1995,10(2):115-145.
  • 2[2]FATIMA SS,WOOLDRIDGE M.Bargaining with Incomplete Information[ A].Advances in Artificial Intelligence-15th Conference of the Canadian Society for Computational Studies of Intelligence[C].2002.30-37.
  • 3[3]PARK S,DURFEE E,BIRMINGHA W.An Adaptive Agent Bidding Strategy Based on Stochastic Modeling[ A].Proceedings of Third International conference Autonomous Agents[C].1999.147-153.
  • 4[4]BADEA L.Learning Trading Rules with Inductive Logic Programming[ A].Machine Learning:ECML 2000[C].2000.39-46.
  • 5[5]SUGENO M.An Introductory Survey of Fuzzy Control[ J].Information Sciences,1985,36:59-83.
  • 6[6]YAGER RR,FILEV D.Essentials of Fuzzy Modeling and Control [Z].1994.
  • 7[7]MINGHUA H.Knowledge and data enginnering[ J].2003,15(6).

同被引文献8

  • 1韩伟,王云,陈优广.基于多智能体协商的电子市场原料配置模型[J].计算机应用,2006,26(12):3008-3011. 被引量:5
  • 2Parsons S, Sierra C, Jennings N. Negotiation Through Argumentation-A Preliminary Report[C]//Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Multi-agent Systems. Kyoto, Japan [s. n.], 1996: 267-274.
  • 3Fatima S, Wooldridge M, Jennings N R. An Agenda Based Framework for Multi-issues Negotiation[J]. Artificial Intelligence Journal, 2004, 152(1): 1-45.
  • 4Faratin E Sierra C, Jennings N R. Using Similarity Criteria to Make Issue Trade-offs in Automated Negotiations[J]. Aritificial Intelligence, 2002, 42(2): 205-237.
  • 5Luo X, Jennings N R, Shadbolt N. A Fuzzy Constraint Based Model for Bilateral, Multi-issue Negotiations in Semi-competitive Environments[J]. Artificial Intelligence, 2003, 148(1/2): 53-102.
  • 6Fatima S, Wooldridge M. Bargaining with Incomplete Information, Advances in Artificial Intelligence[C]//Proc. of the 15th Computational Studies of Intelligence Conference. Canadian: [s. n.], 2002: 30-37.
  • 7Zlotkin G, Rosenschein J S. Negotiation and Task Sharing Among Automnomous Agents in Cooperative Domains[C]//Proceedings of the 11th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Detroit, Michigan: [s. n.], 1989: 912-917.
  • 8Sichman J, Demazeau U. Exploiting Social Reasoning to Deal with Agency Level Inconsistence[C]//Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Multi-agent Systems. San Francisco, CA: [s. n.], 2005: 352-359.

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部