期刊文献+

血管封堵器的临床应用 被引量:19

Clinical application of vascular closure device for femoral arteritomy closure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 评价血管封堵器对血管性介入术后股动脉穿刺点止血的优势。方法 全组 116例病人 ,分为血管封堵器组 ( 5 5例 )和人工压迫组 ( 61例 ) ,观察分析两组的止血成功率、止血时间、下床活动时间以及血管性并发症。结果 在血管性介入术后血管封堵器组 ,止血时间及下床活动时间显著缩短 ;股动脉穿刺点彩色多普勒超声随访无血管病变发生。结论 血管封堵器对股动脉穿刺点能快速、有效地止血 ,缩短卧床时间 。 ObjectiveTo evalulate the efficacy and safety of vascular closure device (VCD) for femoral arteritomy closure. MethodsTotal 116 patients were divided into VCD group ( n =55) and manual compression group ( n =61). The success rat, time to hemostasis, time to ambulation and vascular abnormality in the puncture sites were analyzed. ResultsSignificant differences were found between the two groups either in time to hemostasis or time to ambulation. Following up with Doppler sonography showed no vascular abnormality in the puncture sites in VCD group. ConclusionThe utility of VCD represents a safe and effective alternative to manual compression for arteritomy clousure.Hemostasis and ambulation can be achieved faster with VCD than with manual compression, without increasing femoral access site complications.
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 2004年第8期1253-1255,共3页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
关键词 血管封堵器 人工压迫 股动脉 血管性介入 Vascular closure device Manual compression Femoral artery Vascular intervention
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1[3]Bogart DB, Bogart MA, Miller JT, et al. Femoral artery catheterization complications: a study of 503 consecutive patients[J]. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn,1995,34(1):8-13.
  • 2[5]Christophe T, Rene K,Helene E, et al. A randomized comparison of a percutaneous suture device versus manual compression for femoral artery hemostasis after PTCA[J]. J Interven Cardiol, 2003,16(3):217-221.
  • 3[6]Eric KH, Robert B. Percutaneous arterial clousure device[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2003,14(7):865-885.
  • 4[7]Steven CW, Carin FG, David JE, et al. Complications of a percutaneous sutured-mediated closure device versus manual compression for arteriotomy closure: a case-controlled study[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2003,14(6):735-741.
  • 5[8]Daniel BB. Current status of suture-mediated closure: what is the cost of comfort[J]? J Vasc Interv Radiol,2003,14(6):677-681.
  • 6[9]Kussmaul GW, Buchbinder M, Whitlow PL, et al. Rapid arterial hemostasis and decressed access site complications after cardiac catheterization and angiography: results of a randomized trial of a novel hemostatic device[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,1995,25(9):1685-1692.
  • 7[10]Duffin DC, Muhlestein JB, Allisson SB, et al.Femaral arterial puncture management after percutaneous coronary procedure:a comparison of clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction and two different vascular closure devices[J]. Invasive Cardiol, 2001,13(5):354-362.
  • 8[11]Sesana M, Vaghetti M, Albiero R, et al. Effectiveness and complications of vascular access closure devices after interventional procedures[J]. J Invas Cardiol, 2000,12(8):395-399.
  • 9[12]Kapadia SR, Raymond R, Konpf W, et al. The 6Fr Angioseal arterial closure device: results from a multimember prospective registry[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2001,87(4):789-791.
  • 10[13]Ward SR, Casale P, Raymond R, et al. Efficacy and safety of hemostatic puncture closure device with early ambulation after coronary angiography.Angio-seal investigators[J]. Am J Cardiol, 1998,81(3):569-572.

同被引文献150

引证文献19

二级引证文献70

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部