期刊文献+

左心室射血分数测定方法比较 被引量:3

Comparison of different determination methods of left ventricular ejection fraction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 左心室射血分数是最常应用的心脏收缩功能指标之一,临床常以超声心动图、放射性核素心血管造影和心导管左心室造影等方法测定,这些方法各有优缺点,以超声心动图最方便、使用率最高,放射性核素心血管造影因有放射污染、心导管左心室造影因其创伤性而使应用受到限制。文献报道各方法之间相关性强,但相关性强并不能说明一致性好。一致性检验是方法学之间进行比较的一个严格标准。 Left ventricular ejection fraction is one of parameters which indicate the systolic function. There are three methods applied commonly in clinics which are echocardiography, radionuclide angiocardiography and ceniventriculography. Echocardiography is used frequently due to its convenience and lower cost. Angiocardiography and ceniventriculography are less popular in patients because of radioactive contamination and invasive manipulation. It is reported that good correlation is existed between different methods, but good correlation does not mean good agreement. Agreement test is another strong criteria of methods comparison.
出处 《中国心血管杂志》 2004年第5期378-381,共4页 Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine
关键词 左心室射血分数 超声心动图 放射性核素心血管造影 心导管左室造影 一致性 相关性 Left ventricular ejection fraction Echocardiography Radionuclide angiocardiography Ceniventriculography Correlation Agreement
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Fuster V, Alexander RW, Robert A, et al. Hurst's The Heart. 10th ed. Beijing: [M] McGraw-Hill Education(Asia) Co. and Beijing Medical University Press. 2001,360-366.
  • 2Nahar T, Croft L, Shapiro R. et al. Comparison of four echocardiographic techniques for measuring left ventricular ejection fraction [J]. Am J Cardiol,2000,86:1358-1362.
  • 3Schwarz KQ,Bezante GP, Chen X, et al. Contrast harmonic color Doppler left ventriculography: machine interpreted left ventricular ejection fraction compared with equilibrium-gated radionuclide ventriculography [J ]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr,2000,13:368 378.
  • 4Blamd JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement [J].The Lancet, 1986,327:307-310.
  • 5Naik MM, Diamond GA, Pai T, et al. Correspondence of left ventricular ejection fraction determinations from two-dimensional echocardiography, radionuclide angiography and contrast cineangiography [J]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 1995,25:937-942.
  • 6Royen NV, Jaffe CC, Krumholz HM, et al. Comparison and reproducibility of visual echocardographic and quantitative radionuclide left ventricular ejection fractions [J ]. Am J Cardiol, 1996,77:843-850.
  • 7Shih T, Lichtenberg R, Jacobs W. Ejection fraction: subjecrive visual echocardiograpjic estimation versus radionuclide angiography[J]. Echocardiography, 2003,20 : 225-230.
  • 8Jensen-urstad K, Bouvier F, Hojer J, et at. Comparison of different echocardiographic methods with radionuclide imaging for measuring left ventricular ejection fraction during acute myocardial infarction treated by thrombolytic therapy [J]. Am J Cardiol, 1998,81:538-544.
  • 9Chandra S, Bahl VK, Reddy SC, et al. Comparison of echocardiographic acoustic quantification system end radionuclide ventriculography for estimating left ventricular ejection fraction: validation in patients without regional wall motion abnormalities [J]. Am Heart J, 1997,133:359-363.
  • 10Nosir YF, Fioretti PM, Vletter WB, et al. Accurate measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction by three-dimensional echocardiography. A comparison with radionuclide angiography[J]. Circulation, 1996,94: 460-466.

同被引文献18

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部