摘要
提出了用保序性、一致性、标度均匀性、标度可记忆性、标度可感知性、标度权重拟合性等标准,综合评价层次分析法中的不同标度;并用上述标准对现有的几种标度进行了比较,结论是:对单一准则下的排序,各种标度法都具有保序性,因而建议使用1～9标度;对精度要求较高的多准则下的排序问题,建议使用指数标度e0/5～e8/5或e0/4～e8/4.
In this paper, a new evaluation systems of the scale in AHP is presented, based on the fellow standards: original order' keeping, consistency of judgment, uniformity of scale, perceptibility of scale, fit of scale-weight, etc. By the evaluation systems, such conclusions can be achieved: for any ordering under single criterion, using present known several scales, same order relations can be obtained. Therefore, the scale of 1～9 is suggested for this situations; for higher precise ordering, such as the ordering under multi-criteria, the scale of e^(0/4)～e^(8/4) or the scale of e^(0/5) ～e^(8/5) is suggested.
出处
《系统工程理论与实践》
EI
CSCD
北大核心
2004年第9期51-60,共10页
Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基金
国家自然科学基金(79800024)
安徽省哲学社会科学规划项目(AHSK01-02D044)
关键词
层次分析法
标度评价
一致性
标度均匀性
标度权重拟合性
AHP(analytic hierarchy process)
evaluation of scale
consistency of judgment
uniformity of scale
fit of scale-weight
