期刊文献+

急性心肌梗死直接PCI与溶栓后补救性PCI的对比研究

The study of comparing primary-PCI and rescue-PCI after thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究急性心肌梗死后直接经皮冠脉介入治疗(PCI)和溶栓后补救性PCI的临床造影结果和短期预后,观察终点为30天的死亡率。 方法:连续入选150例ST段抬高的急性心肌梗死患者。按溶栓与否分为直接PCI组110例(73.3%)和溶栓后补救性PCI组40例(26.7%),溶栓药物包括重组葡激酶、重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂、重组纤溶酶原激活剂和尿激酶。分析其临床、造影和预后特点。 结果:与溶栓后补救性PCI组比较,直接PCI组CK和CK-MB峰值低(P<0.05),校正的心肌梗死溶栓临床试验的帧数(corrected TIMI framecounts,CTFC)低(P<0.05),心肌梗死溶栓临床试验心肌灌注分级(TIMI myocardial perfu-sion grades,TMPG)高(P<0.05),死亡率显著降低(P<0.01)。 结论:溶栓后补救性PCI可能使心肌酶增高,死亡率增加。 Objective:To study the clinical and angiographic characteristics and the short-term outcome of primary-PCI and rescue-PCI after thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. Methods: A total of 150 consecutive acute myocardial infarction patients with ST segment elevation were divided into two groups : primary-PCI group(n= 110) or rescue-PCI group(n = 40). The drugs for thrombolysis included r-SAK,rt-PA,r-PA and UK. The clinical, angiographic and prognostic features were analyzed. Results: Compared to rescue-PCI group,the peak values of CK, CK-MB were low(P<0. 05) ,CTFC(corrected TIMI frame counts)was low(P< 0. 05) ,TMPG(TIMI myocardial perfusion grades)was high(P<0. 05) and mortality rate was significantly de-creased(P<0. 01) in primary-PCI group. Conclusions: Rescue-PCI could increase mortality rate and the value of cardiac enzymes.
出处 《国外医学(心血管疾病分册)》 2004年第5期300-302,共3页
关键词 溶栓 直接PCI 急性心肌梗死 补救性 死亡率 临床试验 对比研究 峰值 校正 增加 Acute myocardial infarction Primary percutaneous coronary intervention Thrombolysis Rescue percutaneous coronary intervention
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Grines C,Patel A,Zijlstra F,et al.Primary coronary angioplasty compared with intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction:,six-month follow up and analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials.Am Heart J,2003;145(1):47~57
  • 2Widimsky P,Budesinsky T,Vorac D,et al.Long distance transport for primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction.Final results of the randomized national multicentre trial--PRAGUE-2.Eur Heart J,2003;24(1):94~104
  • 3Gibson CM,Cannon CP,Murphy S,et al.Relationship of the TIMI myocardial perfusion grades,flow grades,frame count,and percutaneous coronary intervention to long-term outcomes after thrombolytic administration in acute myocardial infarction.Circulation,2002;
  • 4Ellis SG,Da Silva ER,Spaulding CM,et al.Review of immediate angioplasty after fibrinolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction:insights from the RESCUEⅠ,RESCUEⅡ,and other contemporary clinical experiences.Am Heart J,2000;139(6):1046~1053
  • 5Kaltoft A,Bottcher M,Krusell L,et al.Establishing primary angioplasty as the preferred treatment for acute myocardial infarction.Scand Cardiovasc J,2002;36(4):215-220
  • 6Gimelli G,Kalra A,Sabatine MS,et al.Primary versus rescue percutaneous coronary intervention inpatients with acute myocardial infarction.Acta Cardiol,2000;55(3):187-192
  • 7Schweiger MJ,Cannon CP,Murphy SA,et al.Early coronary intervention following pharmacologic therapy for acute myocardial infarction(the combined TIMI 10B-TIMI 14 experience).Am J Cardiol,2001;88(8):831-836
  • 8Stone GW,Peterson MA,Lansky AJ,et al.Impact of normalized myocardial perfusion after successful angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction.J Am Coll Cardiol,2002;39(4):591-597

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部