期刊文献+

临界病例拔牙与非拔牙治疗后侧貌突度变化的研究 被引量:6

Changes of Profile Prominence in Borderline Cases with Extraction and Non-extraction Orthodontic Treatment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 比较正畸拔牙与不拔牙治疗对临界病例侧貌突度的影响。方法 由5位正畸专家判断出的33个临界病例,根据其实际接受的治疗方式分为3组:①不拔牙治疗组12例患者;②拔4个第一双尖牙治疗组13例患者;③拔4个第二双尖牙治疗组8例患者。用结构重叠法,以眼耳平面(FH平面)为水平参照平面,对33例患者治疗前后头颅侧位片上反映侧貌突度的解剖标志点进行测量和比较。结果 拔牙组和不拔牙组患者治疗后,仅上下切牙的突度有显著性差异(P<0.01);而两种不同的拔牙方式对患者侧貌突度的影响无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论 对于临界病例,拔牙治疗与不拔牙治疗对侧貌突度的影响主要表现为对上下切牙突度的改变,其对上下基骨及侧貌软组织突度的影响并不明显。 Objective To compare the treatment effect on the prominence of profile in borderline cases between extraction and non-extraction treatment. Methods The sample consisting of 33 borderline cases based on the judgment of 5 orthodontic specialists was divided into three groups according to the treatment way selected by the doctor in charge of the case. Three groups comprised 12 non-extraction cases, 13 four first premolars extraction cases and 8 four second premolars extraction cases. Structure su-perimposition was used to measure landmarks displacements which reflect the change of profile prominence before and after orthodontic treatment using pretreatment FH plane as a frame of reference. Results Only the prominence of upper and lower incisors showed statistically significance between the extraction and non-extraction treatments. There was no statistically significant difference between the extraction of four first premolars and second premolars. Conclusion The main effect of extraction vs. non-extraction on profile of borderline cases is the prominence of upper and lower incisors, while their influences on upper and lower base bone and soft-tissue profile are not obvious.
出处 《华西口腔医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2004年第5期384-386,共3页 West China Journal of Stomatology
基金 卫生部临床学科重点项目基金资助(20011218)
关键词 临界病例 拔牙治疗 非拔牙治疗 侧貌突度 borderline cases extraction treatment non-extraction treatment prominence of profile
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献16

  • 1Tweed CH. Indications for extraction of teeth in orthodontic procedure. Am J Orthod Oral Surg, 1944,30(1):22-45.
  • 2Glenn G, Sinclair PM, Alexander RG. Non-extraction orthodontic therapy: Posttreatment dental and skeletal stability. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1987,92(4) :321-328.
  • 3Bishara SE, Cummins DM, Jakobsen JR, et al. Dentofacial and soft tissue changes in class Ⅲ cases treated with and without extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1995,107( 1 ) :28-37.
  • 4Holman JK, Hans MG, Nelson S, et al. An assessment of extraction versus nonextraction orthodontic treatment using the peer assessment rating (PAR) index. Angle Orthod, 1998,68(6) :527-534.
  • 5Stallard H. Dental articulation as an orthodontic aim. J Am Dental Assoe, 1937,24(3) :347-376.
  • 6James RD. A comparative study of facial profiles in extraction and nonextraction treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1998,114(3) :265-276.
  • 7Saeleus NA, DeSmit AA. Therapeutic changes in extraction vers usnon-extraction orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod, 1998, 20(3) :225-236.
  • 8Baumrind S, Korn EL, Boyd RL, et al. The decision to extract:Part 1 Interclinician agreement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,1996,109(3) : 297-309.
  • 9Stallard H. Dental articulation as an orthodontic aim. J Am Dental Assn Dental Cosmos, 1937,24: 347-376
  • 10Tweed CH. Indications for extracfion of teeth in orthodontic procedure. Am J Orthod Oral Surg, 1944,30:22-45

共引文献37

同被引文献83

引证文献6

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部