期刊文献+

麻风易感人群NK细胞活性的检测 被引量:2

Determination of the activity of NK cell in the susceptible leprous population
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨麻风病易感因素 ,为研究麻风患者细胞免疫低下与遗传因素的关系提供参考数据。 方法 采用改良细胞毒法对恩施州麻风病高发区 12 0位与麻风患者有血缘关系的人群进行NK细胞活性检测 ,并检测当地无麻风病家族史的正常健康人群NK细胞活性作为对照。 结果 大多数与麻风患者有血缘关系的人NK细胞活性与正常人没有差异 ,少数个体NK细胞活性明显低于正常人 (χ2 =4.0 7,P <0 .0 5 )二者有显著差异。 结论 NK细胞活性低下可能是麻风易感原因之一。 Objective To explore the susceptible factors leading to leprous infection and offer reference data for research on the relationship between low cytoimmunity and heredity factors in leprous patients. Methods The activity of natural killer cell from 120 persons having blood relationship with leprous patients in Enshi Prefecture, a high leprous prevalent area were assayed by using modified cytotoxicity test. Local health persons without familial leprosy history were taken as control. Results No differences were observed in activities of natural killer cells between person having blood relationship with leprous patients and the healthy persons without familial leprosy history. But the activities of natural killer cells were obviously lower than a few of healthy individuals (χ2=4.07,P<0.05). Conclusion The low activity of natural killer cells might be one of the causes susceptible to leprous infection.
出处 《中国热带医学》 CAS 2004年第6期1044-1045,共2页 China Tropical Medicine
关键词 NK细胞活性 麻风病 患者 正常人 易感人群 免疫低下 易感因素 结论 参考数据 恩施州 Lleproosy Activity of natural killer cell Susceptible factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1叶本善,孟卫星,李继红,等.麻风患者细胞免疫状态的检测[J].上海免疫学杂志,1994,(14):237.
  • 2李继红,崔茜,叶本善.麻风患者NK细胞活性检测[J].中国麻风皮肤病杂志,2003,19(2):194-194. 被引量:1
  • 3李继红,朱炳发.测定NK细胞活性的简易方法[J].免疫学快报,1987,(7):24.
  • 4[4]Hercend T Schmidt RE.Immunol Today,1988,9:291.

同被引文献42

  • 1翁小满,胡永秀.麻风病免疫中的树突状细胞与T细胞的相互作用及其研究进展[J].中国麻风皮肤病杂志,2005,21(3):200-203. 被引量:2
  • 2李桓英.麻风病研究进展[J].中国麻风皮肤病杂志,2006,22(10):846-848. 被引量:5
  • 3陈小华,翁小满.麻风免疫中IL-12及其受体的研究进展[J].中国麻风皮肤病杂志,2007,23(4):325-328. 被引量:1
  • 4Maw WW,Tomioka H,Sato K,et al.Study on the roles of CD4+and CD8+ T cells in the expression of host resistance to Mycobacterium leprae infection induced in athymic nude mice[J].Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis,1995,63(4):539-545.
  • 5Iellem A,Mariani M,Lang R,et al.Unique chemotactic response profile and specific expression of chemokine receptors CCR4 and CCR8 by CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells[J].J Exp Med,2001,94(6):847-853.
  • 6Sieling PA,Jullien D,Dahlen M,et al.CD1 expression by dendritic cells in human leprosy lesions:correlation with effective host immunity[J].J Immunol,1999,162(3):1851-1858.
  • 7Yamauchi PS,Bleharski JR,Uyemurak L.A role for CD40-CD40 ligand interactions in the generation of type 1 cytokine responses in human leprosy[J].J Immunol,2000,165(3):1506-1512.
  • 8Hashimoto K,Meada Y,Kimura H.Mycobacterium leprae infection in monocyte-derived dendritic cells and its influence on antigenpresenting function[J].Infect Immun,2002,70(9):5167-5176.
  • 9Monot M,Honore N,Gamier T,et al.On the origin of leprosy[J].Science,2005,308(5724):1040-1042.
  • 10Santos DO,Santos SL,Esquenazi D,et al.Evaluation of B7-1(CDao)and B7-2(CD86)costimulatory molecules and dendritic cells on the immune response in leprosy[J].Nihon Hansenbyo Gakkai Zasshi,2001,70(1):15-24.

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部