期刊文献+

计及输电约束的线性供应函数激励显示机制 被引量:3

TRANSMISSION CONSTRAINED INCENTIVE REVELATION MECHANISM OFLINEAR SUPPLY FUNCTIONS
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于博弈论中的机制设计理论和线性供应函数均衡(LSFE)理论,设计了一种激励相容的线性供应函数激励显示机制。依据该机制,所有发电商的最优报价策略为呈报其真实的边际成本曲线;所有用户的最优报价策略为呈报其真实的边际效用曲线;而且参与者(发电商和用户)是否披露其真实的经济信息与输电约束及其他所有参与者的报价策略无关,即所有参与者披露其真实的经济信息为市场惟一的纳什均衡,且该均衡为占优战略均衡。从而,独立系统运行员(ISO)根据参与者的报价曲线实施经济调度,以实现电力资源的优化配置和社会福利的最大化。不仅从理论上论证了所提出的激励机制的合理性,而且以IEEE 3机9节点电力系统为例进一步验证了该机制在限制市场势力和提高电力系统运行效率方面的有效性。 Based on mechanism design and linear supply function equilibrium (LSFE) of game theory, an incentive compatible mechanism called incentive revelation mechanism of linear supply function is designed. According to this mechanism, the optimal bidding strategies of all generators are submitting their true marginal cost curves and the optimal bidding strategies of all consumers are submitting their true marginal benefit curves. Furthermore, whether or not a participant (generator or consumer) presents its true economic information is independent of transmission constraints and the actions of other participants, i.e., revealing true economic information of all participants is the unique Nash equilibrium of the market and the equilibrium is dominant-strategy equilibrium. Consequently, independent system operator (ISO) can make optimal distribution of electric power resources and maximize social welfare by economic dispatch with participants' bidding curves. Not only is the rationality of the incentive mechanism presented testified, but also the effectiveness of the mechanism in restricting market power and improving the operation efficiency of power system is demonstrated by taking IEEE 3-machine 9-bus power system as an illustrative example.
出处 《电力系统自动化》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2004年第19期6-11,26,共7页 Automation of Electric Power Systems
关键词 电力市场 机制设计 市场势力 线性供应函数均衡 占优战略均衡 博弈论 electricity market mechanism design market power linear supply function equilibrium (LSFE) dominant-strategy equilibrium game theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Overbye T J, Gross G. Market Power Evaluation in Power Systems with Congestion. In: Proceedings of IEEE Tutorial on Game Theory Applications in Electric Power Markets. New York: IEEE, 1999. 61-69
  • 2Hobbs B F, Metzler C B, Pang J S. Strategic Gaming Analysis for Electric Power Systems: An MPEC Approach. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 2000, 15(2): 638-645
  • 3Kelman R, Augusto L, Barroso N. Market Power Assessment and Mitigation in Hydrothermal Systems. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 2001, 16(3): 354-359
  • 4Silva C, Wollenberg B F, Zheng C Z. Application of Mechanism Design to Electric Power Markets. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 2001, 16(1): 1-7
  • 5Fahrioglu M, Alvarado F L. Designing Incentive Compatible Contracts for Effective Demand Management. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 2000, 15(4): 1255-1260
  • 6Baldick R, Grant R, Kahn E. Linear Supply Function Equilibrium: Generalizations, Application, and Limitations.http://www. ucei. berkeley. edu/ucei/pwrpubs/pwp078. html
  • 7Rudkevich A. Supply Function Equilibrium in Power Markets:Learning All the Way. Cambridge (MA): Tabors Caramanis and Associates, Technical Report, 1999. 1299-1702
  • 8Berry C A, Hobbs B F. Analyzing Strategic Bidding Behavior in Transmission Networks. Utilities Policy, 1999, 8(3): 139-158
  • 9Green R. Competition in Generation: The Economic Foundations. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2000, 88(2): 128-139
  • 10Samuelson P A, Nordhans W D. Economics. 16th ed. NewYork: McGraw-Hill Companies, 1997

二级参考文献21

  • 1[1]Samuelson P A, Nordhans W D. Economics, 16th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies Inc, 1997
  • 2[2]Overbye T J, Weber J D, Pattern K J. Analysis and Visualization of Market Power in Electric Power Systems. Decision Support Systems, 2001, 30(3): 229~241
  • 3[3]Lusan D A, Yu Z, Sparrow F T. Market Gaming and Market Power Mitigation in Deregulated Electricity Markets. In: IEEE/PES Winter Meeting. New York: 1999
  • 4[4]Alvarado F L. Market Power: A Dynamic Definition. In: Bulk Power Systems Dynamics and Control IV: Restructuring Conference. Santorini (Greece): 1998
  • 5[5]Borenstein S, Bushnell J, Knittel C. Market Power in Electricity Markets: Beyond Concentration Measure. UCEI, 1999, PWP-0598
  • 6[6]Kelman Rafael, Augusto Luiz, Barroso N. Market Power Assessment and Mitigation in Hydrothermal Systems. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 2001, 16(3): 354~359
  • 7[7]Falk J. Determining Market Power in Deregulated Generation Markets by Measuring Price-cost Margins. Electricity Journal, 1998, 11(6):44~50
  • 8[8]David A K, Wen Fushuan. Market Power in Electricity Supply. IEEE Trans on Energy Conversion, 2001, 16(4): 352~360
  • 9[9]Stoft S. Power System Economics: Designing Markets for Electricity. New York: Wiley-IEEE Press, 2002
  • 10[10]Berry C A, Hobbs B F. Analyzing Strategic Bidding Behavior in Transmission Networks. Utilities Policy, 1999, 8(3): 139~158

共引文献72

同被引文献45

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部